I made a calculator that works on baccarat (very effective)

[romareinhardt]

this works only at a specific Baccarat table with special rules.

This is a PnL graph calculated by the simulator over 50,000 rounds.
Total Rounds: 50,000
Player Bets: 18,741 (37.5%)
Bunker Bets: 16,403 (32.8%)
Total Bets: 35,144 (70.3%)
Player Win Rate:----%
Banker Win Rate:----%
Tie Count: 4,701
Total Profit: $5,626
Wagered: $56,260
Player Actual RTP: 101.72%
Banker Actual RTP: 101.46%
Shuffle Count: 509
Number of Cards Used: 185,193

Estimated play time for 50,000 rounds is 350 hours.
Depending on the rake back, further profits will be expected.

Are you interested in this?

 

[mulven]

1.16 - Gambling Systems: For some reason, there are people who believe that the membership are morons. The members may be a lot of things, but stupid they ain't. If you attempt to sell a gambling "system", the membership will expose your nonsense and publicly shame you. Banning from the site is highly probable.#

You can't beat baccarat unless you cheat. Or unless your special table with special rules has some stuff going on i don't know about

This strategy will have a point of failure eventually just like martingale.

Either way you can't push a gambling system on the forum.

 

[lucks_maximus]

I'll trade you for my coin flip calculator.

 

[romareinhardt]

You can't beat baccarat unless you cheat. Or unless your special table with special rules has some stuff going on i don't know about

This strategy will have a point of failure eventually just like martingale.

Either way you can't push a gambling system on the forum.

this is not a kind of betting system i just dont like to bet when its under 100% RTP

 

[romareinhardt]

I'll trade you for my coin flip calculator.

 

[Lemon]

Are you interested in this?

Yeah sure, just upload it here and we'll all take a look

Thanks in advance!

 

[Mr Shine]

You can't get positive RTP on Baccarat unless they allow the deck to get extremely close to the edge, (which they won't) and a statistically very high number of picture/10s are remaining making the tie barely above RTP. Nobody is going to let you just sit around for such an irregular event.

 

[dunover]

You can't beat baccarat unless you cheat. Or unless your special table with special rules has some stuff going on i don't know about

This strategy will have a point of failure eventually just like martingale.

Either way you can't push a gambling system on the forum.

No, they can't sell it but are free to talk about it and the theory behind it, while everyone else rolls their eyes and asks how house edge can be consistently overcome for the first time in human history.

Perhaps a new area of quantum mathematics will be revealed.

 

[romareinhardt]

You can't get positive RTP on Baccarat unless they allow the deck to get extremely close to the edge, (which they won't) and a statistically very high number of picture/10s are remaining making the tie barely above RTP. Nobody is going to let you just sit around for such an irregular event.

That's usually how it goes.

 

[mulven]

No, they can't sell it but are free to talk about it and the theory behind it, while everyone else rolls their eyes and asks how house edge can be consistently overcome for the first time in human history.

Perhaps a new area of quantum mathematics will be revealed.

Aye but every guy who has a system usually comes with the same pitch and tries to get things to a DM so they can close a sale. Was just being wary of that pattern

 

[mulven]

That's usually how it goes.

If it's card counting the player bet then you need penetration of a 30 count or better which is just too unlikely a thing to profit from and that's even with no shoe interventions. If it's the sidebets on a specific side bet kind of baccart table, the these are more susceptible to card counting (main game isn't due to being symmetric). Even then for most side bets including the basic tie one you'd need lots of hands and lots of penetration.

I'm guessing it might be sidebets with parameters that would be unrealistic to replicate in real world scenarios

 

[ultra100]

i just dont like to bet when its under 100% RTP

Who does?

It's the nature of the game - otherwise, iGaming biz wouldn't exist. House edge is what keeps casinos & the whole Igaming biz alive.

 

[Casinos Hate Winners]

Don't listen to the trolls. I only play +EV too, but in roulette. Interested?

 

[Casinos Hate Winners]

If it's card counting the player bet then you need penetration of a 30 count or better which is just too unlikely a thing to profit from and that's even with no shoe interventions. If it's the sidebets on a specific side bet kind of baccart table, the these are more susceptible to card counting (main game isn't due to being symmetric). Even then for most side bets including the basic tie one you'd need lots of hands and lots of penetration.

I'm guessing it might be sidebets with parameters that would be unrealistic to replicate in real world scenarios

Maybe he's hole-carding?

 

[romareinhardt]

View attachment 216238Don't listen to the trolls. I only play +EV too, but in roulette. Interested?

ahaha cant never be +EV on roulette

 

[romareinhardt]

If it's card counting the player bet then you need penetration of a 30 count or better which is just too unlikely a thing to profit from and that's even with no shoe interventions. If it's the sidebets on a specific side bet kind of baccart table, the these are more susceptible to card counting (main game isn't due to being symmetric). Even then for most side bets including the basic tie one you'd need lots of hands and lots of penetration.

I'm guessing it might be sidebets with parameters that would be unrealistic to replicate in real world scenarios

it doesnt need that much of counts

 

[Casinos Hate Winners]

ahaha cant never be +EV on roulette

Why not?)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

It's about me)))

 

[geordiecolin]

If the calculator does not conclude that you lose it must be defective