The CAP Solution

[The Dude]

There have been a crapload of threads dealing with the CAP implosion, and it is somewhat tiresome since it pertains mostly to negativity and how effed up the situation is/was.

I felt it would benefit everyone to begin a new thread that is much more positive and constructive - how to fix something that is (IMO) broken. I'm hoping that some of you will take the opportunity to share your ideas on what you feel would be a valid solution.

I'll give you an example of what I think would be a good start.

I look at CAP as a website that delivers information, service and support for webmasters AND affiliate programs (somewhat like what Casinomeister does - but we are focused on the player).

It should focus primarily on what it can do online, and how it can provide these services without considering itself to be some kind of cash cow. This is how it can be done:

• As long as Warren and Lou are connected to CAP, all shared/connected business entities need to be removed from the site. Also, these shared/connected business entities should be identified for everyone's FYIs.
  
• Never forget that the CAP exists to support its members. Never take a webmaster's idea and assimilate it (for instance the Affiliate Watchdog's T&C auditing program, APCW's player audit etc). Webmasters should be encouraged to develop these programs - you should not be competing with them.
  
• Make the Certification free. Allow the certified companies to advertise via second tier ref share or media buys whatever. The aff programs should not be able to "buy" their certification.
  
• Have a criteria to be certified. For instance, they need to be audited by a third party certification that means something (Affiliate Watchdog, APWC, etc for examples).
  
• Have a criteria to be forum members. Just like in Casinomeisterland, members who commit fraud, spam etc., get the boot. Same thing should go for webmasters. Make membership worth something.

In the beginning CAP did not hold conferences/exhibitions. They started the Spring break in Florida a few years ago, and all I heard were raves on how great it was. It's only recently that it became CAP ber alles - do every conference in every place possible, and try to coincide them with other gaming events. This caused a bunch of problems for nearly everyone. I'll tell you why.

This is a small industry, and companies only have so many resources to either attend or exhibit at conferences. Three or four a year is doable, and anything more than this is excessive. There is already the ICE, EIG, AIG, and one in Australia. The CAC is already established in Europe, Asia, and now in Moscow as well. If CAP is running conferences in tandem or near tandem, it just screws everything up for everyone but themselves.

Remember, the webmaster and affiliate manager is in your (CAPs) best interest

• Do away with the conferences; stick with the Spring breaks.

The comment I heard most was that the success of the SBs were from the lack of exhibitions and stands. People just met, networked, and partied. This is much more affordable for the aff programs. Keep it simple, stupid

If you do something well - then stick with it.

I would like to see a winter break as well - even a skiing excursion between the ICE and AIG.

Competition:

• There should be competition between the GPWA, CAP, and any other entities - but it needs to be friendly competition.

CAP, GPWA, APCW, etc. should consider themselves to be "webmaster buddies" (like I have buddies here ) and try to work with one another. Make an attempt to contribute to the industry and support one another.

I've done this with other sites since the beginning. I have linking partners, I have webmaster buddies in the forum, I refer members to other webmasters when they have questions I can't answer. Sure these are my competitors, but I've learned that providing a service supersedes everything else businesswise. I provide a service by assisting and working alongside many.

If you have anything to add or detract - post freely .

 

[mojo]

As long as Warren and Lou are connected to CAP, all shared/connected business entities need to be removed from the site. Also, these shared/connected business entities should be identified for everyone's FYIs.

Thank You! I don't think anyone can begin to move on until this is accomplished. However, it would be difficult to swallow if Warren and Lou suddenly 'sold' Cap.

That is just what jumped out to me. This post is a great place to start. TY.

 

[jetset]

Thought provoking and useful post, Bryan - to which I would add that the parties involved really need to conduct some introspection on their individual conduct over some of these pretty cringeworthy events.

There needs to be a personal commitment to a more professional, decent style of management than some of the behaviour we have seen to date, and a realisation that the business lies in the service industry, not controlling it.

Competition is a healthy force that can spur better results....but not the style of competition where character assassination and the physical destruction of competitors is planned.

I was taught to be suspicious of firms that trash their competitors instead of using smarter and more competitive business moves to gain an advantage.

 

[rowmare]

That just about covers it, Bryan.

 

[Webzcas]

To be honest all I personally would want is transparency in any and all business dealings which affect affiliates, players and programs. Add to this a clear indication as to what process is involved in certification and a commitment not to plagarise the work of others that used to be championed by the management of CAP - ie Affiliate Guard Dog, APCW Audits to name but two.

Whether any of the above can be done whilst the status quo remains in control of CAP remains to be seen. However they have lost a lot of credability and support over the last few months.


The model you have described in your post Bryan is ideal and would be a kind of Affiliate Community Utopia. Unfortunately I can see what transpires over the coming weeks falling way short of meeting your criteria

 

[lots0]

All good ideas Bryan.

But I gotta agree with Webzcas.

Bryan, what do you propose if Lou and Warren decide to continue just like in the past and ignore everyone and just do their same old stuff behind closed doors?

Because that is what I see happening.


P.S. I know this is somewhat negative, but for the life of me I just can't put a positive spin on this.

 

[The Dude]

...Bryan, what do you propose if Lou and Warren decide to continue just like in the past and ignore everyone and just do their same old stuff behind closed doors?...

If this were the case, the CAP as we know it would implode on itself - just like we are seeing now. I seriously don't think that is going to happen.

 

[lots0]

I seriously don't think that is going to happen.

Well for the good of everyone, I hope your right and I'm wrong.

 

[rowmare]

CAP is an affiliate community. It earns its money via affiliate programs who are there because a large number of affiliates, their target market, read the forums there. Because of this fact, it should be obvious what WE as affiliates can and should do to nurture ethics.

 

[jetset]

Rowmare has perhaps hit one of the nails on the head here - but whether a mass action by affiliates could be orchestrated or even happen is arguable - it could be like trying to herd a bunch of cats!

But I do think that if enough affiliates behaved in a cohesive manner it could be influential on the affiliate programs from whence most of the money probably flows.

What the affiliate programs do is the key to ensuring a better standard of corporate behaviour imo. If enough of them let their disappointment and embarrassment at recent events show in a concrete way.... that could be persuasive in all sorts of directions.

 

[mojo]

Rowmare has perhaps hit one of the nails on the head here - but whether a mass action by affiliates could be orchestrated or even happen is arguable - it could be like trying to herd a bunch of cats!

But I do think that if enough affiliates behaved in a cohesive manner it could be influential on the affiliate programs from whence most of the money probably flows.

What the affiliate programs do is the key to ensuring a better standard of corporate behaviour imo. If enough of them let their disappointment and embarrassment at recent events show in a concrete way.... that could be persuasive in all sorts of directions.

Herd of Cats, that's funny.

I'm pretty sure a mass action could be done. Judging from not only this forum but from the large public denouncement we have all seen everywhere.

Affiiate Programs may also be suffering as well. Astronomical fees at CAP and huge conference costs have to be effecting the bottom line. Fees go up and up, depending who you are of course. Which in effect hurts the rest of us, many of which are banned putting further hurt on the programs as they are not getting their 'moneys worth'.

Affiliate Programs are not just Caps partners but all affilites as well. Therefore this whole mess effects everyone. So yes, it could definatly be done IMO.

 

[swampwitch]

Make the Certification free. Allow the certified companies to advertise via second tier ref share or media buys whatever. The aff programs should not be able to "buy" their certification.

The casinos themselves need to insist that the programs representing them go along with this. There needs to be a REASON for the programs and/or the casinos to be certified. Certification should be earned. Payola does not an ethical program make.

 

[dominique]

it could be like trying to herd a bunch of cats!

Lol, yes definitely that is my experience.

If it wasn't so, there would long have been some sort of Union.

Really, affiliates practically never agree on anything, just like players here don't agree much of the time.

Occasionally maybe a 10th or less agree on something and some cohesive action results among that group.

The very reason affiliates choose to work online is because they are individualistic and don't want to fit into any mold. The majority works very hard. They are busy worrying about finding decent promotions, ranking in google, learning CSS, collecting payments (getting harder and harder), crashing servers and on and on. Tons of headaches to keep one busy day after day, all day. The majority just reads the boards once a week or so, and then just threads that deal with casinos they promote. Or even more common, they just use the boards to contact aff program managers when they have problems and never read at all.

The day all affiliates agree on some action I will faint.

 

[lots0]

Really, affiliates practically never agree on anything, just like players here don't agree much of the time.

Dom - just a side note. But you might want to take a look around CM you would notice that there are a lot of webmasters/affiliates here, more than what you think.

I guess a lot of webmasters just wanted a place away from the drama were they could post what they think without fear of being banned or ostracized.

 

[mojo]

If it wasn't so, there would long have been some sort of Union.

I think many are still waiting for CAP to come clean and maybe use some of CM's suggestions.

I don't think that will last forever though. Something needs to happen soon. We all know that when it gets to that point affiliates do get together. Google Grand Prive. In fact, you helped orgainize that Dom. Why would this be different?

 

[The Dude]

...The day all affiliates agree on some action I will faint.

I think I could safely say that 95% of affiliates AND affiliate managers would agree on the proposal I made.

I'm only giving suggestions on how to stop the implosion at CAP - how to save face, and how to make CAP a truly industry friendly company.

This is not rocket science, and it could easily be done.

 

[dominique]

Dom - just a side note. But you might want to take a look around CM you would notice that there are a lot of webmasters/affiliates here, more than what you think.

Decent webmasters need to read player forums - how else are you going to know what's going on with the casinos and make informed choices?

Google Grand Prive. In fact, you helped orgainize that Dom.

Yeah and in the past 888 and cpays and, and... - but still only at the most 10% of webmasters joined each of these endeavors, probably a lot less than that.

 

[lots0]

Decent webmasters need to read player forums - how else are you going to know what's going on with the casinos and make informed choices?

And like I pointed out affilaites need a place away from the drama, where they can feel like they are not being preyed upon.

I think I could safely say that 95% of affiliates AND affiliate managers would agree on the proposal I made.

Yup, every affiliate I have spoken to has told me that they agree with Bryan.

However, most also believe CAP/PAP is NOT going to fix their problems.

 

[Antonia1953]

Bryan, the standards and ideas that you have outlined are integrity based and the success of implementation would be impossible without the operators being of the same mind. How does CAP feel about your concepts? Are these people capable of the type of character and dedication that you propose?

Standards are set by expectation and the recognition of improper behavior. Higher standards of measure cannot be achieved without conflict. It provokes vision and courage; two of the ingredients most required in industry pioneers.

Avoiding conflicts of interest does nothing except undermine our own true convictions and there is not a more demoralizing condition for one to be in. Killing the messenger doesn't change the message.

Lots0, there are many here that have a lot to lose and believe that there is a real risk of this happening. Silence is the expression of many emotions, including support.

 

[dominique]

I think I could safely say that 95% of affiliates AND affiliate managers would agree on the proposal I made.

I'm only giving suggestions on how to stop the implosion at CAP - how to save face, and how to make CAP a truly industry friendly company.

This is not rocket science, and it could easily be done.

I agree that the outlined busness model is very doable for an affiliate forum.

I have no idea what the business details at CAP are, but I would assume a radical change in business model would entail major layoffs, cancellation of conferences and whatnot.

But - I really don't know.

 

[lots0]

Dom - I don't think you can separate the CAP forum from the CAP business, the two have always been completely integrated.

As I said before, if all you want is an affiliate forum for you and your friends, it seems to me you would be far far better off to just start a new forum apart from CAP.

Lots0, there are many here that have a lot to lose and believe that there is a real risk of this happening.

I know this.
I can only hope that taking the "high road" will pay off in the end.
(God, I sound cheesy. But, I really mean it.)

 

[Antonia1953]

I think you have raised a valid issue. I agree fully that there should be no payments issued for certification. It would neutralize the issues concerned with whether certifications were being bought, rather than earned. Their business structure depends upon the income generated by these fees and any proposal of change to them will have to address this. There are only three ways to go; reduction of cost, increase in cash flow or increase volume of affiliates. CM has already mentioned areas that could reduce cost, but rarely will that handle the replacement of income. Cash flow is critical in any industry, but especially in entertainment. How can the income be replaced? Any suggestions?

The volume will come automatically with trust.

 

[jas2587]

Dom - I don't think you can separate the CAP forum from the CAP business, the two have always been completely integrated.

As I said before, if all you want is an affiliate forum for you and your friends, it seems to me you would be far far better off to just start a new forum apart from CAP.


I know this.
I can only hope that taking the "high road" will pay off in the end.
(God, I sound cheesy. But, I really mean it.)

cheesy but well said
Cindy

 

[lots0]

...Their business structure depends upon the income generated by these fees and any proposal of change to them will have to address this. There are only three ways to go; reduction of cost, increase in cash flow or increase volume of affiliates. CM has already mentioned areas that could reduce cost, but rarely will that handle the replacement of income. Cash flow is critical in any industry, but especially in entertainment. How can the income be replaced? Any suggestions?

The volume will come automatically with trust.

Well if in fact CAP/PAP want to be real affiliate advocates.
I would suggest they focus on providing services/education (both free and paid) to the 3rd tier affiliates under their various affiliate accounts and base their business model on the success of their 3rd tier affiliates instead of basing their business model on the various 'fees' charged to the casinos/poker rooms.

 

[The Dude]

I agree that the outlined busness model is very doable for an affiliate forum.

I have no idea what the business details at CAP are, but I would assume a radical change in business model would entail major layoffs, cancellation of conferences and whatnot.

But - I really don't know.

Major layoffs? I wasn't aware that CAP employed a lot of people. You could easily run it with a staff of volunteers or a handful of part-timers. That's just my take on it. CAP's overhead should be extremely low. Those programs that they assimilated could be outsourced to the same webmasters - there would really be no loss of income for anyone.

Like I mentioned, CAP conferences could limit themselves to the Spring breaks etc. Again, this would only take a couple of people to organize. Get Lyceum media to take care of it.

Bryan, the standards and ideas that you have outlined are integrity based and the success of implementation would be impossible without the operators being of the same mind. How does CAP feel about your concepts? Are these people capable of the type of character and dedication that you propose?

Actually, what I've outlined is not so much integrity based, but based on good business sense. But then again, to do well in this business, you must stick to good business ethics.

Like I implied before, if you treat it like a cash cow - it's gonna die.

 

[Antonia1953]

Well if in fact CAP/PAP want to be real affiliate advocates.
I would suggest they focus on providing services/education (both free and paid)

Excellent idea! There are multiple levels of income for mentoring forms of education. The instructors should be from all areas of the industry, so that no specific agenda could monopolize the program. Achievement rewards for the affiliates would jumpstart vitality. What would be some of the classes available? An Introduction to the business would be a must and a good one to offer as free. Where would you go from there?

 

[Simmo!]

I largely agree with the opening post. I think the core issue lies in the use of the word "Certification" and the fact it's paid for. Changing this to something like "Sponsored" would be both more ethical and up-front, and would ensure a continued revenue flow. Everyone knows where they stand then. Indeed this is what GPWA does. But, there also needs to be a disclaimer attached showing there is no endorsement too.

Conferences: I agree. Competing with CAC in Amsterdam, whether deliberately or otherwise, just splits the industry down the middle and causes resentment. The scheduling of Spring Break just made an uncomfortable situation worse. The conferences need to be organised with both CAP and GPWA/CAC involved in the scheduling. I was angry about this (still am), as much as I like and respect Alex who is caught in the crossfire.

The other major issue for me and others is the strong-arm tactics that have been used recently. The AGD thing left a very bad taste in the mouth because kwblue is an affiliate, the people CAP are supposed to be working with, not against. The BCP accreditation in the middle of an uprising didn't help. Nor did all the C&D's that went out just in time for Christmas. That period, before Cardspike, was when I seriously started to question CAP's true direction. That kind of thing HAS to stop. It alienates affiliates, myself included. How do you trust someone who bans your colleagues and starts a competing service?

Incidentally I share a different view on the bannings. If you own a forum, you can ban who the hell you like for whatever reason you like. So all this "freedom of speech" nonsense some people throw out is crap. No-one has a "right" to be on a forum. BUT... that said, the way CAP handled this whole situation, banning Michael, Bryan and others was not only very bad PR but a missed opportunity. In fact banning Michael was a catalyst. I think CAP should really look at this aspect and try to use criticism as an opportunity to demonstrate dignity and professionalism. Bottom line is, if they don't, people will be afraid to say what they think and CAP will not get important feedback on ways in which to improve.

At the end of the day, it appears that CAP want to "own" the industry. Nothing wrong with ambition, but not at any cost, which is how it appears from the outside. That ethos needs to change if CAP wants to work towards regaining trust IMO. And for what it's worth, I want CAP to continue - it's been a very valuable addition to the industry and I don't care if they make $millions - but it needs to be ethically run and have respect for it's surroundings.

Cheers,

Simmo!

 

[RobWin]

The other major issue for me and others is the strong-arm tactics that have been used recently.

Incidentally I share a different view on the bannings. If you own a forum, you can ban who the hell you like for whatever reason you like. So all this "freedom of speech" nonsense some people throw out is crap.

Cheers,

Simmo!

Nice choice of words there...

 

[dominique]

The BCP accreditation in the middle of an uprising didn't help. Cheers,

Simmo!

Re BCP:

I think it to be one of the good things.

They were accredited. We raised hell. The certification was withdrawn until the affiliate problems were completely fixed. Only then was it recertified.

The concept of CAP worked in that case. And I am proud of getting that fixed.

That is why I have been at CAP all these years - because things can and do get fixed there.

Like I say over and again, I believe in fixing things, not breaking them.

 

[WagerX]

I also agree that there should be a clear separation between "certification" and "sponsorship". I understand the need for a program like CAP to make a decent profit, but the lines between the two are ill defined.

I know that when I first started marketing I used the "certification" process at CAP to find quality programs. I feel that in a way CAP let me down by not telling me that the "certification" process is primarily based on monetary payments. I think that now, it's handled as an unspoken fact that only the experienced webmasters have caught on to. At the time there were three programs no experienced webmaster would touch.

So, calling them "sponsorships", with unyielding criteria for both affiliates and players is imperative.

 

[RobWin]

You guys are talking about calling it "Sponsorship" or "Sponsored", but in my view that's not the right term either because all these years that CAP has been charging the fees it has really been the casinos that have been "Sponsoring" CAP since they are the ones paying the fees, not the other way around, so who is really "Sponsoring" who here.

Maybe CAP could use the term "Listed" and that should clarify any misconceptions regarding "Certified" or "Sponsored".

Similar to how the word "List" is used in Bryan's "Accredited List"

 

[mojo]

I am posting here what I posted at the gpwa. I'm just burnt out. I think what clinches it for me is posts by Dominique saying that she 'just doesn't know' the business end. Dom, I know you are trying to help, you always do. I hope you know I think that you do. But things cannot just go on as if nothing has happened at CAP.

I haven't been able to read lately. It is all to upsetting to keep reading 20 page threads and spinning our wheels. I've said what I wanted to say. There are some terrific and elequent posts that are greeted with more silence. We have given CAP every opportunity to respond. Nothing. How long are we supposed to go on like this?

Now what?

Are we going to continue with these threads or are we going to do something. I feel played as an affilaite somewhat. We get all worked up and post and post until we are blue in the face and what comes of it? Nothing.

Lou is posting at cap. Cap is singing their praises on how wonderful the conference was. Listing the programs that will attend CAP over CAC. Sorry, or they will attend 'both'. I am getting ill.

Where is a Statement? An admission? An APOLOGY for putting us, the affiliates and programs, through this?

Affiliates:

What do we want to do now? Do we rogue them similar to a rotten casino? I don't know about everyone else but we are getting nowhere posting and I feel like a pawn here. The wheels are in motion and no matter what damage control anyone does, without action it is senseless. The games keep rolling on and there is no end in sight. We need to make an end. I don't want to hurt anyone. We need some answers from cap and that is NOT going to happen. But this HAS to end.

Affilates and Programs: What do we do to end this? If no one else will take action NOW then we need to.

 

[The Dude]

...
They were accredited. We raised hell. The certification was withdrawn until the affiliate problems were completely fixed. Only then was it recertified.

The concept of CAP worked in that case. And I am proud of getting that fixed.
...

How much Koolaid have you been drinking over there at CAP anyway?

Who has raised hell about player x who has been owed $1.5 million at Cirrus and Prism casino for years?(Gambling Wages is "Certified" - always has been). Hmmm - no one. So don't go there on that.

Grand Prive has been dicking around players since 2004 - no one at CAP got upset about them until the cash flowed stopped for affiliates, then all hell broke loose.

Chipleader is listed - so Absolute Poker and Ultimatebet are "Certified" at CAP It's like CAP is living on planet Pluto. Does anyone remember the scandals that ripped millions off of poker players? I guess the affiliates were paid, so that's cool.

CAP certifies anyone - anyone who wants to part with their cash. Do you think they gave a refund to BCP while the complaints were heard? Nope - don't think so.

The Certification is worthless in my opinion if these programs are allowed to proceed unchecked. As I pointed out, there are a number of "Certified" affiliate programs that condone unorthodox marketing techniques, nonpayment for players, and other dubious meanderings.

Just because an affiliate program claims to pay their affiliates doesn't necessarily mean that it's a good program. And just because it can afford $10k-20k a quarter to be listed in an aff forum, doesn't mean it's a good program either. There is a total lack of responsibility and accountability on CAP's part towards its affiliates and their players.

Like I mentioned before - CAP has been treated like a cash cow - it's broken - one of the ways to get it back on it's feet is to do away with the paid "certification" and focus in on ethics.

 

[Pinababy69]

Who has raised hell about player x who has been owed $1.5 million at Cirrus and Prism casino for years?(Gambling Wages is "Certified" - always has been). Hmmm - no one. So don't go there on that.

Grand Prive has been dicking around players since 2004 - no one at CAP got upset about them until the cash flowed stopped for affiliates, then all hell broke loose.

Chipleader is listed - so Absolute Poker and Ultimatebet are "Certified" at CAP It's like CAP is living on planet Pluto. Does anyone remember the scandals that ripped millions off of poker players? I guess the affiliates were paid, so that's cool.

CAP certifies anyone - anyone who wants to part with their cash. Do you think they gave a refund to BCP while the complaints were heard? Nope - don't think so.

The Certification is worthless in my opinion if these programs are allowed to proceed unchecked. As I pointed out, there are a number of "Certified" affiliate programs that condone unorthodox marketing techniques, nonpayment for players, and other dubious meanderings.

Just because an affiliate program claims to pay their affiliates doesn't necessarily mean that it's a good program. And just because it can afford $10k-20k a quarter to be listed in an aff forum, doesn't mean it's a good program either. There is a total lack of responsibility and accountability on CAP's part towards its affiliates and their players.

Thank you, thank you, thank you Bryan. You know.....your original post in this thread has some great ideas, but IMO it was missing the MOST critical point(s). And you have outlined those above to a tee.

I have sat on my hands for months now re: the Grand Prive issue. I tried to comment on the Gambling Wages stuff when it was an active topic. The only time that affiliates/affiliate organizations (in general) get upset and take action...is when their own income is directly affected. There is no sense me echoing what you have said above, other than to say you have hit the nail right on its proverbial head. NOW we are at the true root cause of the problem, and what is so very wrong with this industry.

The player is the one who provides the revenue, for casino, for affiliate programs and for affiliates. I could give a rat's ass if an affiliate program pays its affiliates on time...what good is that if the program/product they are hawking doesn't look after the most important part of the equation? The PLAYER.

Certified program, sponsor, listed company.....call it whatever you like. It's all worthless if there isn't some criteria in place to protect the player and ensure that they are at the top of the food chain.

Until EVERYONE involved in this industry realizes that, it will never be "fixed". And unfortunately, ethics isn't really something you can instill in someone, or teach them. They either have them, or they don't. When making money is always the primary goal, ethics will ALWAYS come second.

God, I can't believe you posted that. I'm still in shock. I didn't think anyone was actually going to get to the real problem....which is really more than just CAP. It's the whole way that business is done on the affiliate end of things. I spent over an hour the other day writing a very similar post...and ended up deleting it without posting. I didn't think anyone wanted to hear it.

Thank you again.

 

[jinnia]

No truer words have been spoken!!

Thank you Meister!! GREAT post!!! :notworthy

 

[Webzcas]

Bryan. You have the balls to say what a lot of people have been thinking but are too afraid to.

THANK YOU!

CAP's silence on recent events is very very telling. Hoping it will go away is wishful thinking. Many webmasters and also decent programs feel the same way.

 

[Zoozie]

The player is the one who provides the revenue, for casino, for affiliate programs and for affiliates. I could give a rat's ass if an affiliate program pays its affiliates on time...what good is that if the program/product they are hawking doesn't look after the most important part of the equation? The PLAYER.

I have also been holding this though to myself during this heated discussion. scum casinos cheat players every day due to greedy affiliates giving them traffic. But when the affiliates get cheated all hells breaks loose.

In the first year of my online casino experience I get cheated for 200$ at
Prestige Casino. The casino-portal that I used was casino.dk (not existing anymore) and casino.dk agreed I was getting cheated and they paid me out of their own money! It is sad for the industry that a scandal like this burst open, but only a few affiliates does have my sympathy. You got involved and contribute to a rotten industry, so what do you expect to get back?

I am not now making this post to be popular here on CM But this is my opinion though. If you are an affiliate, look at you site and see how many
rogue casino you promote before you start complaining in public.

 

[BingoT]

You know it's funny that in my seven years of promoting places I only ran into one down fall in this gaming industry and that was from BingoSuite and they are out of business but with a new management now & I remember well that Lou & Dom made sure that I would get paid because my manager just got the job at CAP's and it all worked out in the end.
For all the players that I have sent to anyplace that had issues they were all taken care of pretty fast.& I Thank God also I never ran into a on going battle Player vs any gaming business.
All affiliates need to all work together for a better tomorrow and not think of themselves.
Money is the root of all evil & Greed is on top.
The word Trust in a person goes along way in this business
I just hope all this works out with all parties involved in all this mess.
Thanks
B-T

 

[The Dude]

Let's not forget it's a two lane street - bad players are to blame for the existence of rogues as well. There are many members of this forum by the way who don't care where they play - their only concern is that they get paid by the casino. Just look at some of the Prism/Cirrus/crappy casino threads - and for every disgruntled player there are a few who chime in that they have no problem.

Saying this, let's keep this thread on the rails - this is a discussion on how CAP can be fixed.

 

[Antonia1953]

I have no idea why CM even started this thread. Bryan, you were unhappy with the first thread because you felt it was non-productive, so you started a new thread. The opening of that thread indicated that you were looking to repair the situation, but now it has gone back to seriously silly mudslinging. This is your site and you have the right to ban anyone you want...that's a no brainer, but it has nothing to do with the "price of cotton". When freedom of speech on a public site is nothing but crap and that disposition is applauded in the midst of trying to find a solution to a problem...productivity ends.

 

[dominique]

The way I always saw it is that Casinomeister deals with player issues, and CAP deals with affiliate issues.

If I had a dollar for everytime I have said that affs need to read Casinomeister to be able to make decent decisions about their sites, I would be sitting pretty.

And yes, I have never gotten involved in what affiliate media does. All I was involved in is the message board, moving threads to the appropriate forum (most end up in general discussion even when there is a forum with precisely that topic) and seeing to it that people do not launch personal attacks against each other. I don't have admin access to the forum either.
I have limited time, I have my own business to run.

And, yes, I have turned up the heat when affiliates got screwed. Whether the offending program was present at CAP or not. And some who didn't fix the aff issues got booted permanently, although that is rare.

I rely heavily on Casinomeister to inform myself of player issues, and of course the feedback I get through my own site. I base my decisions on who gets a spot on my site on these three factors, Casinomeister, my own player feedback and the affiliate side. It has worked for my players and for me.

I don't think relying on either affiliate info or player info by itself is enough to base decisions on. The house must be clean in both respects, what hits one group today hits the other tomorrow.

Affiliates are responsible for their own actions, just like anyone else. Information about everything is easily available online, and everyone needs to research before they act, affiliates and players alike.

I see the aff programs at CAP as mostly just being available for discussion and dispute resolving, much like the casino reps are here. With the difference that at CAP they get a forum and this is settled publically.

I didn't design the way CAP works, but as a user, it works for me. It just can't be, and never was meant to be, the only source of info one bases decisions on.

 

[slotplayer]

I don't get it. Why does everyone want something to be other than what it is revealed to be? that's just wishful thinking.

The true certification for me anyway is the feedback posts from you folks the players and the affiliates over at CAP.

 

[The Dude]

I have no idea why CM even started this thread. Bryan, you were unhappy with the first thread because you felt it was non-productive, so you started a new thread. The opening of that thread indicated that you were looking to repair the situation, but now it has gone back to seriously silly mudslinging. This is your site and you have the right to ban anyone you want...that's a no brainer, but it has nothing to do with the "price of cotton". When freedom of speech on a public site is nothing but crap and that disposition is applauded in the midst of trying to find a solution to a problem...productivity ends.

I'm not looking to repair the situation - I'm giving my thoughts on what ought to be done. Take it or leave it. I haven't seen any mudslinging - mostly constructive and a few justifiable criticisms.

Your references on prices of cotton, banning people, and freedom of speech elude me. I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[The Dude]

The way I always saw it is that Casinomeister deals with player issues, and CAP deals with affiliate issues...

Casinomeister deals with industry issues - not just player issues. That's why there are two newsletters - one for the general public, and one for industry folk.

 

[Nandakishore]

Affilates and Programs: What do we do to end this? If no one else will take action NOW then we need to.

1. We must accept that CAP is a combination of an affiliate forum and hard business.
2. If this construction is hurting us, we must stop all connections with it. Stop going to the CAP forum AND to all events sponsored and/or organized by CAP. Whether that would affect CAP in anyway, I don't know. If it does, it would be awesome!
3. As for the affiliate programs, they may take some actions if the sinking reputation of CAP starts hurting them. All that we as affiliates can do is to make it explicitly clear to the programs certified by CAP that we care a damn for such certificates.
4. The biggest problem confronting us is the lack of a third party certification of affiliates, programs and casinos. With all due respects to Casinomeister, AGD and others, they cannot be considered as a 'third party' as long as even a single banner of a gambling site or a program is visible on their sites. And since a certificate has no value unless it is from a neutral organization and not buyable, we should stop thinking of certifying any program or affiliate.
5. However, if CM. AGD, GIA, PAL and GPWA/APCW can come together and define with the help of its forum members a number of criteria to assess the benefits of affiliate programs for their members, and find a procedure how to use these criteria to assess the programs under active participation of their members, then, of course, we wont have anything which can be called certificates, but "only" evaluation of the values of the programs for a number of esteemed organizations whose members are active affiliates and players.
The affiliate programs may then start weighing benefit of the 'certificates' they buy for plenty of money against this evaluation which does not cost them anything.

But the question is: can we create and manage such a unified process?

I hope we can say: YES, WE CAN !

 

[dominique]

4. The biggest problem confronting us is the lack of a third party certification of affiliates, programs and casinos. With all due respects to Casinomeister, AGD and others, they cannot be considered as a 'third party' as long as even a single banner of a gambling site or a program is visible on their sites.

I have also always been a supporter of AGD, I think the service is completely impartial, regardless of banners.

Facts are facts, and AGD deals solely with facts, these being changes in affiliate T&Cs. The changes are what they are. They are published for everyone to see and consider. They are facts, pure and simple.

No matter what you do, someone has to pay the piper because few people in this world can afford to work full time for free. I wish I was wealthy and could afford to do that. I have all kinds of constructive ideas of what to do with my time if I didn't have to make a living.

 

[Nandakishore]

I have also always been a supporter of AGD, I think the service is completely impartial, regardless of banners.
.

I agree. The services given by AGD and CM are extremely valuable for affiliates and players. But, they are not, according to my understanding, third parties, and, therefore should not be considered as institutions eligible to certify programs.

 

[NASHVEGAS]

Bryan,
Have you ever considered a moderated private section for player's only???.......Yes, I would post in regards to my opinion on a fix in a private section but I've read too many threads at CAP and at times here to be much more inclined than hence.....With exceptions of course, it is nothing more than Liar's Poker.

 

[rowmare]

Like I mentioned before - CAP has been treated like a cash cow - it's broken - one of the ways to get it back on it's feet is to do away with the paid "certification" and focus in on ethics.

Amen, brother!

 

[GaryWatson]

certify (srt-f)
v. certified, certifying, certifies
v.tr.
1.
a. To confirm formally as true, accurate, or genuine. (?)
b. To guarantee as meeting a standard: butter that was certified Grade A. See Synonyms at approve. (?)
2. To acknowledge in writing on the face of (a check) that the signature of the maker is genuine and that there are sufficient funds on deposit for its payment. (?)
3. To issue a license or certificate to. (what is it for?)
4. To declare to be in need of psychiatric treatment or confinement. (?)
5. Archaic To inform positively; assure. (Just like most other portals)

certified
Adjective
1. holding or guaranteed by a certificate: a certified acupuncturist (?)
2. declared legally insane (?)

Source :

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

In all intents and purposes the certification appears as fake as can be and should be placed here

https://sussexmskpartnershipeast.com/rogue-casinos/

I have no issues with CAP as an affiliate resource but that is where I feel they have overstepped the mark. There is no quality testing. The certification is misleading innocent players and affiliates into parting with their money.

Questionable sites go to CAP with their check books and fix the matter there and then. They are now certified to do what they want with the backing of CAP.

They promote some good programs but scrape the barrel at times. A banned member here was spamming his site at CM and CAP. He pissed of the majority of most members on both forums but when the checkbook came out, he got the green light at CAP and all was forgiven. That was a warning signal that CAP should never have been allowed to prance around with their own self proclaimed certification status.

Just because it is a large site with many followers, it doesnt mean it doesnt belong here

https://sussexmskpartnershipeast.com/rogue-casinos/

The way i look at it, they have a strong bias towards those who pay for a label that isnt worth anything other than their promotional efforts and duping players into thinking it is a creditable site to play on.

Dom is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Here and CAP is a contradiction in terms. I dont always agree with CM's choices of sites but there is consistency and a true evaluation of a gaming sites worth. CAP is a portal with its own merits, some good, some bad but it should never be allowed to offer its expertize (certification) to sites with a blindfold on. They only give the rogue sites a foothold in this industry which is laden with scammers and the easy buck mentality.