external image

Big time gaming now have changeable RTP's?

nick85

Registered
Joined
Oct 30, 2024
Location
UK
Has anyone else noticed Big Time Gaming have a new update/Version on their slots and i found on 1 site (Kwiffed.com) slots such as Bonanza, Millionaire, Danger High Voltate are running at 94. whatever % ! I thought BTG games RTP's were not changeable but looks like they are now ..
 
Interesting way to introduce yourself.

I have not heard any announcements from the company - unsurprisingly. Perhaps other members of the forum have noticed nerfing of their RTP's elsewhere.

If virtually every other major slots developer is doing it, would you be surprised if BTG also started?
 
Perhaps other members of the forum have noticed nerfing of their RTP's elsewhere.
I wonder if its worth having a list of those who don't although considering the trajectory that list will likely not have anyone on it soon!

I have noticed that providers who do lower RTPs never got round to adding variants of some games as I've reliably found the games at 96%+ whilst most games are turned down to 94% or lower. A few examples listed below:
  • Print Studios - Royal Potato, Out of the Ice, Huntress Wild Vengeance, Crystal Golem
  • Relax Gaming - Hex, Moneycart 1/2, Zombie Circus, Dragons Awakening
  • Games Global Studios - Lucky Leprechaun Clusters, Oni Hunter Plus, Breakaway Deluxe, Basketball Star Deluxe, Football Star Deluxe
There are plenty more but most providers who do lower RTPs do manage to cover every game. It's also trending towards 96% variants not even existing for newly released games as I've noticed a large amount of providers do this. BGaming is variable but atleast they are still pushing out 97% games when you get the max RTP variant!
 
Been the case for months now.
Yup, they offered German-only RTPs (around 90%) for a while, but now they've caved in and started offering lowered versions (94% etc) of an increasing part of their back catalogue.

Much like a decade ago it was player choice because of the limited number of providers (with plucky upstarts like NetEnt), now it's operator choice because there are far too many providers trying to gain visibility... why WH will ask for - and get - 88% RTP slots.

I have noticed that providers who do lower RTPs never got round to adding variants of some games as I've reliably found the games at 96%+ whilst most games are turned down to 94% or lower.
Couple of factors here - the popularity of the game, and the difficulty of retrofitting new maths models. If you avoid the well-trodden path you'll find plenty of games still at 96% - but that will sadly change over time.

The worrying part is providers that are taking the step to eliminate 96% entirely - that is a dangerous step and one that should be challenged.
 
Yup, they offered German-only RTPs (around 90%) for a while, but now they've caved in and started offering lowered versions (94% etc) of an increasing part of their back catalogue.

Much like a decade ago it was player choice because of the limited number of providers (with plucky upstarts like NetEnt), now it's operator choice because there are far too many providers trying to gain visibility... why WH will ask for - and get - 88% RTP slots.

It isn't that bad across them all providers, by the way. Only Novomatic's are at around 90%, but most others are not lower than 94% except for a few slots from Hölle Games.

Below is Löwen Play. In Germany, it has similar popularity as WH here. All games with a blue badge in the bottom corner are 94%+ and those without are below that.

Eye of Horus for example is at 94,83%, and Book of Dead 94,25%.

Lowen.webp
 
BTG have been crap on 96% for ages now so we'll need help on 94%, although some will say "nothings changed" :rolleyes: prior to the RTP cut.

Some streamers will still hit crazy 'x' regardless of RTP :p

No proof and not getting into any lengthy debates with anyone but I (and others) would maybe suggest the lowers RTP's have been around and running for a while now, just they've finally got round to "advertising" it whether compliant or not.
 
It isn't that bad across them all providers, by the way. Only Novomatic's are at around 90%, but most others are not lower than 94% except for a few slots from Hölle Games.

Below is Löwen Play. In Germany, it has similar popularity as WH here. All games with a blue badge in the bottom corner are 94%+ and those without are below that.

Eye of Horus for example is at 94,83%, and Book of Dead 94,25%.

So where is the consumption tax being paid? 5% of stakes isn't something you can really hide, so if they're not shaving it off the headline RTP (the 90% maths models) they must be adding it on top? It's the same scenario fundamentally, just painted differently...

If we take Eye of Horus above, a 21c (for simplicity) spin of a 20c game would be 90.3% effective RTP... I would say it makes things easier for the providers, but if Germany won't take it, William Hill certainly will... 🤡
 
Myself and a few friends have pretty much stopped playing slots now. I will have the odd deposit if a casino with proper rtp offers me a good bonus but im pretty much done.

Half the casinos stall payment, dont pay or just nerf the rtp.

Ruined the entire experience and have zero interest anymore.
 
Much like a decade ago it was player choice because of the limited number of providers (with plucky upstarts like NetEnt), now it's operator choice because there are far too many providers trying to gain visibility... why WH will ask for - and get - 88% RTP slots.

Just wow, a lose-lose for everyone except WH.

A bizarre twist created by increased provider competition and increased regulation being a possible contributor - reducing operator competition in many markets.
 
Just wow, a lose-lose for everyone except WH.

A bizarre twist created by increased provider competition and increased regulation being a possible contributor - reducing operator competition in many markets.
Yup, and the sad part is that increased provider competition doesn't translate into increased variety of slots either - everyone trying to make their own Book of Ra clone, or Pharaoh's Tomb (Eye of Horus), or Lightning Link, or 3 Pots...
 
I'd happily go back to playing at MG only Viper Client casinos in the blink of an eye.

The weird thing is they never used to display their RTPs, until they were finally forced to, and it turned out basically everything was at 95.5%-97%, so it's not like they'd ever been hiding anything!
 
I'd happily go back to playing at MG only Viper Client casinos in the blink of an eye.

The weird thing is they never used to display their RTPs, until they were finally forced to, and it turned out basically everything was at 95.5%-97%, so it's not like they'd ever been hiding anything!

No hesitation, no thought, no looking back.

A true 7/10 value for money session, even if end result was a bust out.

Great game choice, good overall player experience and the times when I'd REALLY enjoy a session, especially after work most Friday's when good old 32Red did a 100% reload :p
 
I'd happily go back to playing at MG only Viper Client casinos in the blink of an eye.

The weird thing is they never used to display their RTPs, until they were finally forced to, and it turned out basically everything was at 95.5%-97%, so it's not like they'd ever been hiding anything!
I'd go back as well Chops.....and I would do so MUCH FASTER than even you (or Jono) would.
Because that's how much I loved MG Viper.

THE. GOLD. STANDARD. And no one on planet Earth will stand a chance in hell of convincing me otherwise.

If MG Viper still existed, I'd be shilling on its behalf more than you have ever "shilled" on behalf of 3Dice.
Which is really saying something.
 
No hesitation, no thought, no looking back.

A true 7/10 value for money session, even if end result was a bust out.

Great game choice, good overall player experience and the times when I'd REALLY enjoy a session, especially after work most Friday's when good old 32Red did a 100% reload :p
Those were the days mate :)

Also liked their sister casinos (Dash, Golden Lounge and Nedplay).
Have to admit, I used to enter that Daily Avalon Freeroll any chance I got and with all 4 accounts to boot. No wonder I won it a handful of times:oops::laugh:

Also quite liked the Fortune Lounge Group (7 Sultans, Euro Palace, Platinum Play, Royal Vegas and Vegas Palms).
Unfortunately, they exited the UK market a mere 12 months after I joined CM.
But I really enjoyed what little time I had there.

And of course, Casino Rewards. A place that I still play at today, despite the WR being hiked up to 200xB from 30xB :eek::eek2:. Have actually beaten the WR a handful of times, believe it or not.
Needless to say, I take their bonuses a hell of a lot less frequently nowadays.

There is that saying....you never truly appreciate something until it's gone.
That is MG Viper for me in a nutshell.
 
Nedplay for the Scots (lol) and the 32Red sister sites. Fortune Lounge I took a bonus at every single one of the 10+ sites and coverted about half. There was also another big group who later went dodgy where I did the same, Jackpot City Group.
 
BTG have been crap on 96% for ages now so we'll need help on 94%, although some will say "nothings changed" :rolleyes: prior to the RTP cut.

Some streamers will still hit crazy 'x' regardless of RTP :p

No proof and not getting into any lengthy debates with anyone but I (and others) would maybe suggest the lowers RTP's have been around and running for a while now, just they've finally got round to "advertising" it whether compliant or not.

Well, as per the norm, I needed to question my rtp for a certain period, as it was absolutely ****ing shocking. I don’t know what period they’ve taken the rtp from, but it certainly wasn’t the period I asked for.

What I noticed in the reply though, was that she states the game is running at 94.62%. Really! That’s not what it says in the help file.

IMG_4576.webp
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4592.webp
    IMG_4592.webp
    31.5 KB · Views: 141
Last edited:
Never, ever going to happen but if these games are running at (or close to) their advertised RTP and above board and squeaky clean as we're led to believe, then players should get full access to stats, workings, under the bonnet etc.

May sound daft to some (most?) but if players know what they're getting in to and what they're getting into is honest to what they're told then should they still choose to play then no one could ever complain again.
 


Write your reply...

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top