What Is Your Definition Of Censorship?
The definition of censorship is when a person or group takes it upon him/her/themselves to dictate the morality of others by examining books, film, etc. to make sure there is nothing "objectionable" in them. If anything is found, it will not be allowed.
I'd much rather tolerate them than silence them, for the simple reason that I don't want to be silenced myself. If we start telling people what they can and can't say, silencing "unacceptable" opinions or beliefs.....
What is your definition of censorship?
Would you rather tolerate someone you don’t agree with, on the principle that you each mutually tolerate each other despite disagreeing, or do you try to do what you can to silence them? What do you think of people who find censorship oppressive only when it is their own ideas/thoughts/opinions that are being oppressed?
What would you do if you lost your voice?
Censorship is when anything a person might say, see, hear, or write is subject to control by another.
Mob Mentality?
men·tal·i·ty /mɛnˈtælɪti/ Show Spelled[men-tal-i-tee] Show IPA
–noun,plural-ties.
1.mental capacity or endowment: a person of average mentality.
2.the set of one's mind; view; outlook: a liberal mentality.
Mob definition at Dictionary.com, directed at or reflecting the lowest intellectual level of the common people: mob appeal; the mob mentality. ... to attack in a riotous mob: The crowd mobbed the consulate.
Pot Stirrer
Pot Stirrer - A person who feels it necessary to try and create more drama in regards to a situation/arguement/debate in which they are an outside observer. Usually by way of a comment or statement.
Criticism
Negative Criticism vs. Constructive Criticism
Knowing the difference between negative criticism and positive criticism can help you in all walks of life. The ability to tell constructive criticism from negative criticism is a life skill, so let’s get to figuring it out! Generally speaking, it’s like the difference between counseling somebody and yelling at them.
Constructive criticism promotes improvement or development, and negative criticism is pretty much the opposite of it. It’s rather easy to sum up negative criticism, as compared with constructive criticism. That’s because negative criticism is pretty much a cop out. A negative critique can be hammered out in a couple of minutes, while a constructive critique is a labor of love.
........................................................................................................
All of the above has been pulled from the internet definitions. This is only to give everyone hear the understanding that all these things that some of us are referred to as, fit as well those who use these things to undermine us.
There are more than one type of mob mentality on this forum, but the one type only wants to have the other one seen. I, even when reading the posts of those who object to our right to speak and voice our feelings or experiences, never think of them as being intellectually lower nor feel the need to constantly criticise them.
However, when your criticism and censorship has pushed us into a corner, it is only natural to want to stand up and fight back rather than cower like a dog that has suffered long term abuse.
Constantly trying to censor your fellow forum members, is an effort in futillity as we who want to hold to our last bits of freedoms, will only let our voices be the last thing we let go of.
Constant censorship of posters that don't think like another poster can stagnate a forum where there is no interest left other than announcements and reviews with no input from anyone. If we are to bend at knee to the pressure of being censored, then what have you actually accomplished?
Possibly the death of a free, within reason public forum? Is this really what you are seeking?
I have noticed, unless threads really get out of hand, Bryan and the Moderators never come in and beat up forum members. There are many times they may participate or critic something, but they do it in a constructive way that is not demeaning to anyone unless they are deserving of more than a slap on the back of the hand. But that is for them to do because this is their forum that we are all privileged to be a part of.
As for the thank you button, somewhere I had read one of the moderators stating it has been used and abused as an "FU" button, which is not cool and I feel the same goes for the Nominate button. Members ruin the meaning of it when it too is used as an "FU" button rather than truly nominating a post that is deserving and appreciated by all.
I hope we all can reflect on this that we and even me, can learn from this and just try to be a little kinder and a little more understanding for your fellow forum members.
The definition of censorship is when a person or group takes it upon him/her/themselves to dictate the morality of others by examining books, film, etc. to make sure there is nothing "objectionable" in them. If anything is found, it will not be allowed.
I'd much rather tolerate them than silence them, for the simple reason that I don't want to be silenced myself. If we start telling people what they can and can't say, silencing "unacceptable" opinions or beliefs.....
What is your definition of censorship?
Would you rather tolerate someone you don’t agree with, on the principle that you each mutually tolerate each other despite disagreeing, or do you try to do what you can to silence them? What do you think of people who find censorship oppressive only when it is their own ideas/thoughts/opinions that are being oppressed?
What would you do if you lost your voice?
Censorship is when anything a person might say, see, hear, or write is subject to control by another.
Mob Mentality?
men·tal·i·ty /mɛnˈtælɪti/ Show Spelled[men-tal-i-tee] Show IPA
–noun,plural-ties.
1.mental capacity or endowment: a person of average mentality.
2.the set of one's mind; view; outlook: a liberal mentality.
Mob definition at Dictionary.com, directed at or reflecting the lowest intellectual level of the common people: mob appeal; the mob mentality. ... to attack in a riotous mob: The crowd mobbed the consulate.
Pot Stirrer
Pot Stirrer - A person who feels it necessary to try and create more drama in regards to a situation/arguement/debate in which they are an outside observer. Usually by way of a comment or statement.
Criticism
Negative Criticism vs. Constructive Criticism
Knowing the difference between negative criticism and positive criticism can help you in all walks of life. The ability to tell constructive criticism from negative criticism is a life skill, so let’s get to figuring it out! Generally speaking, it’s like the difference between counseling somebody and yelling at them.
Constructive criticism promotes improvement or development, and negative criticism is pretty much the opposite of it. It’s rather easy to sum up negative criticism, as compared with constructive criticism. That’s because negative criticism is pretty much a cop out. A negative critique can be hammered out in a couple of minutes, while a constructive critique is a labor of love.
........................................................................................................
All of the above has been pulled from the internet definitions. This is only to give everyone hear the understanding that all these things that some of us are referred to as, fit as well those who use these things to undermine us.
There are more than one type of mob mentality on this forum, but the one type only wants to have the other one seen. I, even when reading the posts of those who object to our right to speak and voice our feelings or experiences, never think of them as being intellectually lower nor feel the need to constantly criticise them.
However, when your criticism and censorship has pushed us into a corner, it is only natural to want to stand up and fight back rather than cower like a dog that has suffered long term abuse.
Constantly trying to censor your fellow forum members, is an effort in futillity as we who want to hold to our last bits of freedoms, will only let our voices be the last thing we let go of.
Constant censorship of posters that don't think like another poster can stagnate a forum where there is no interest left other than announcements and reviews with no input from anyone. If we are to bend at knee to the pressure of being censored, then what have you actually accomplished?
Possibly the death of a free, within reason public forum? Is this really what you are seeking?
I have noticed, unless threads really get out of hand, Bryan and the Moderators never come in and beat up forum members. There are many times they may participate or critic something, but they do it in a constructive way that is not demeaning to anyone unless they are deserving of more than a slap on the back of the hand. But that is for them to do because this is their forum that we are all privileged to be a part of.
As for the thank you button, somewhere I had read one of the moderators stating it has been used and abused as an "FU" button, which is not cool and I feel the same goes for the Nominate button. Members ruin the meaning of it when it too is used as an "FU" button rather than truly nominating a post that is deserving and appreciated by all.
I hope we all can reflect on this that we and even me, can learn from this and just try to be a little kinder and a little more understanding for your fellow forum members.

)

That still cracks me up. 
and not be offended at all. 



