New Grey Zone Casino Review Mr JackVegas Casino

[Webzcas]

We have a new casino review that has been published earlier today, the casino in question is the Progress Play owned Mr JackVegas Casino, which has a licence from the UKGC.

Key takeaways from the review include games from over 80 casino software providers and a well rounded selection of payment providers.

Max also comments:

No record of complaints on Casinomeister which is pretty impressive given the casino has been around for over a decade. Licensing is good, UKGC and Malta. Self-exclusion policy looks robust and fit for purpose. Complaints procedure is good and backed by eCOGRA which is one of the better ADRs in the business. From our perspective MrJackVegas is “two thumbs-up.

 

[andysbetting1187]

@Webzcas when these reviews come out, shouldn't one of the cons be listed that the casino charges for withdrawals (1% capped at £3) to highlight this to the players?

Also I am not to up on general t&cs so it might be standard, but to me including terms such as wagering 25% of a deposit in one bet could be considered as suspicious play just gives the casino a way out (especially coupled with the one around if you make a big bet and win, your next bet being below 65% of the previous could be considered suspicious)

If these are standard terms happy to redact the above but I do think these should be made clearer in the reviews section

 

[Webzcas]

Yep, I agree and will pass on.

 

[PeenyBunslinger]

Some info on which RTP a casino has its games set to would be pretty handy information in these trying times. Most of the time you can't check without registering an account first, which is a pain in the balls.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Some info on which RTP a casino has its games set to would be pretty handy information in these trying times. Most of the time you can't check without registering an account first, which is a pain in the balls.

I agree.

I wouldn't bother with ProgressPlay anyway.

Far superior operators than those.

As @andysbetting1187 mentions above. No casino who charges for withdrawals will get my cash.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Also I am not to up on general t&cs so it might be standard, but to me including terms such as wagering 25% of a deposit in one bet could be considered as suspicious play just gives the casino a way out (especially coupled with the one around if you make a big bet and win, your next bet being below 65% of the previous could be considered suspicious)

If these are standard terms happy to redact the above but I do think these should be made clearer in the reviews section.

Also agree.
Those are not standard terms across the industry.
No casino should tell you how you can and can't bet with raw cash.
I would consider those terms to be predatory.
Avoid.

On top of that. No casino should be getting 'Two Thumbs Up' with terms like those.