Roguish PKR revoking bonus for no reason.

[topoor]

Hi,

Last week I signed up for a new account with PKR Casino. I deposited $200 and received the signup bonus. I wagered around $10000 on Casino Holdem and withdrew my money with no problems. A day later I received an email from PKR inviting me to partake in another promotion. This time a 50% reload bonus of $250. Ideposited $500 and again wagered around $10000 on Casino Holdem. This time I did much better and won around $300 when the bonus was released. I withdrew again.

3 days after my withdrawal I received the following email.

After a thorough review of your account it is evident that you have abused the PKRCasino Reload bonus.

Please direct your attention to points 9 and 10 of the bonus Terms & Conditions (see below)

You have now been permanently banned from PKR and all funds gained by abusing the reload bonus have been seized.

The decision of the PKRCasino management team is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

Regards

Frank
PKR Security Team
[email protected]


Reload Bonus Terms & Conditions
(1) To qualify for the reload bonus, you must make a deposit of $25 or more between 21:00:00 GMT on Friday, 04 July 2008 and 23:59:59 GMT on Sunday, 06 July 2008. For the purposes of this bonus for existing PKR customers, a fund transfer into your PKRCasino balance will count as a casino deposit. (2) You must wager a total of forty times the pending bonus amount before the bonus is credited to your account. The pending bonus amount will be equal to 50% of the qualifying deposit amount. To receive the maximum payout of $250 bonus, you must wager $10,000 after making a deposit of at least $500. Wagering requirements only need to be met on the portion of the deposit which qualifies for the deposit bonus, for example, a deposit of $700 will qualify for a bonus of $250, with wagering requirements of $10,000. (3) A maximum of $250 will be paid out in bonuses to any one player. (4) Wagers placed on Blackjack, Pontoon, Baccarat, European or American Roulette, Craps, Sic Bo, Video Poker, or any available variations of these games do not count towards the wagering requirements. (5) Only one bonus per account per household. (6) Once you have successfully met the deposit and wagering requirements for this bonus, the bonus will be automatically credited to your account. (7) Wagering requirements must be completed no later than 23:59:59 GMT on Thursday, 31 July 2008. (8) This offer cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer. Any current bonuses or promotions must be completed before wagering requirements towards this promotion will be valid. (9) PKRCasino reserves the right to take action against any player we believe has abused this bonus in any way. This action may range from a withdrawal of bonus privileges to forced account closure. (10) PKRCasino reserves the right to withhold any bonus payment if it believes that the promotion has been abused and/or where the terms of the offer are not fulfilled, or any irregular wagering patterns are found. (11) PKRCasino reserves the right to withdraw or amend this offer at any time, without prior notice. The decision of the PKRCasino management team is final and no correspondence will be entered into.


I dont see how I have "abused" anything or anyone? I played a mixture of $1 and $5 bets as I had done for the signup bonus only 2 days earlier. The bonus was released after I had met any wagering requirements so I cannot have done anything that would prohibit its release such as playing a disallowed game as surely it wouldnt have released? I think perhaps it upset them that I had not lost a great deal of money at their casino but rather I won.

I dont think its fair that this casino should offer a promotion and then renege on it. I am a pensioner who is aged 62 and although I gamble recreatonally I cant afford to risk money when I stand no chance of winning. I have received no money back from PKR, not even my initial $500 deposit for the reload and they do not respond to my emails. They do not have a telephone number either. I am thinking the initial signup bonus was a sweetener to make me think they were reputable and would pay ok. They then get me to deposit twice as much with the reload offer and then rip me off. I wonder if I would have received this treatment if I had lost money. At one point I was down to my last $80 but managed to pull it round so it was not plain sailing.

It is disgraceful that a company can behave in this manner.

I would like to take this further. What is the best course of action please?

See Related Threads:

• PKR and Microgaming
• Videoslots Acquiring PKR Poker Software
• PKR.com Being Ridiculous...
• PKR - Updater Stopped Me From Tourney
• Who Wants the Return of 3d Poker Software - Like PKR

 

[Rhyzz]

Did you play Casino Hold'em exclusively?

How any company can claim a player who plays Casino Hold'em is a bonus abuser is beyond me, it has a huge house edge.

I'd be asking for further details if I were you, it seems very strange that would remove your bonus if you're a Hold'em player.

 

[blizeH]

Hi, just to let you know that you're not alone and I had the same e-mail under very similar circumstances.

I fired off a quick (very polite!) e-mail to them so I'm going to wait to hear a response - will let you know how I get on.

 

[topoor]

They refuse to provide me with further details categorically stating that I am a bonus abuser and they have banned me from their site. I have spoken via live chat with "Motie" a supposed manager whose attitude is an absolute disgrace when asked what I had done replied with "Give us some credit" and that "you know better than me why you chose to abuse the bonus." It literally took me 10 requests for her name and position to get it out of her. I had to pratically beg.

They refuse to explain any further and will not provide any information on when I can expect to receive my money except to state that someone will be in contact to verify my identity.

Here is an exerpt from the live chat. I am a 62 year old woman. I have never been treated like this by a casino.

motie: You violated the terms and conditions of a bonus, we exclude bonus abusers from our site
Me: how?
motie: Mrs *****, please give us some credit
Me: I ask you again, how?
Me: And please be advised that this chat will be recorded.
Me: Please clearly state what you mean by "give us some credit"
motie: it is recorded here too
Me: Great then there can be no dispute
Me: I ask again, Please clearly state what you mean by "give us some credit"
motie: you are banned from our site

motie: You are not entitled to the bonus. you can only withdraw the remainder of the balance on the account excluding the bonus pending ID verification by our security team
Me: Why have I not been asked for identity verification?
Me: And I ask you again. Please clearly state what you mean by "give us some credit"
motie: see my answer above
motie: You are not entitled to the bonus. you can only withdraw the remainder of the balance on the account excluding the bonus pending ID verification by our security team
Me: Why have I not been asked for identity verification? And I ask you again. Please clearly state what you mean by "give us some credit"

motie: The answer to why you abused the bonus should come from you
motie: I can see
Me: excuse me?
Me: I met all conditions of the bonus
motie: You know better than me why you chose to abuse the bonus

I have still not been asked for ID. I have still not been refunded. Nobody should play at this casino.

Thank you for your post BlizeH, I wonder if there is anyone else who they have done this to?

 

[topoor]

Did you play Casino Hold'em exclusively?

How any company can claim a player who plays Casino Hold'em is a bonus abuser is beyond me, it has a huge house edge.

I'd be asking for further details if I were you, it seems very strange that would remove your bonus if you're a Hold'em player.

Yes I played Holdem exclusively. A mixture of $1 and $5 bets.

 

[topoor]

I have now received a request for ID. I promptly replied with a copy of my passport and a utility bill. Although quite what this has to do with bonus abuse Im not sure. Another attempt to legitimise non payment perhaps? An attempt to keep all my money?

Can casinos shout bonus abuse without having or even alluding to some evidence or explanation and get away with it? PKR certainly seem to think so.

I have PABed.

 

[vinylweatherman]

Given that play was identical on the two bonuses, then either BOTH were "abused" or neither. They cannot claim only the reload was abused, and not the first.

Their lack of a reason shows that they are just guessing, no terms have been broken, and they are just sore losers, you did something "impossible", which was to beat a sucker's game twice on the trot, therefore you simply HAVE to be "cheating" in some manner, but they have no idea how, but know that without the bonus you would probably not ended up ahead.

The typical "bonus abuser" will take the juicy first bonus and run with the money, they would NOT return again for a lesser offer, this is what "loyal players" do - giving the casino a chance to win back some of the money.

The ID has nothing to do with bonuses, it is becoming routine whenever a payment is made to a player.

The PAB process may reveal what is going on, but on the face of it, this just looks like a rogue casino miffed that a player won on a high house edge game, one that would normally be a "cash cow" for the casino.

I have heard worse though, a player of SLOTS was accused of "abusive play", and this surely has to be impossible.

 

[vinylweatherman]

Odder by the minute!

I have had a look at their site, and they claim to be licenced by both Alderney and the UK Gambling Commission. This is rather odd, as their UK licence is dated 1st Sept 2007, and I recall a press story about the fact that NO online gaming site had bothered with a UK Licence at that stage due possibly to unfavorable 15% tax rates.

The chat script, if it genuinely comes from a company licenced both by Alderney AND the UK Gambling Commission beggars belief.

Both licences are available for inspection on the PKR site, and seem genuine looking (but how would players know that anyway).

I had a look on the Alderney site, and a search for "PKR Casino" yields ZERO matches. Their PDF copy shows they got the licence in 2006, and it is number 23, sadly, the Alderney commission offer no way for players to make an independent check themselves as to whether an online site claiming to be licenced there genuinely is.

I have serious doubts about this lot now, surely having both a UK and Alderney licence is overkill, meant to impress the unwary.
If they have indeed got these licences, they have breached their terms.

For Alderney, the procedure is to formally complain to the site, and then (if no joy) to the Alderney commission.

I suggest contacting PKR again, making a formal complaint about this sequence of events, and state that if you do not receive a satisfactory responce within, say, 14 days, you will complain directly to the Alderney commission, with the details specified on their site's PDF copy of their licence no 27.

With luck, this will scare the proverbial out of them, and your deposit at least should return in a flash - winnings can be pursued at leisure.

As well as Alderney, you could complain to the UK Gambling commission, they claim & display that licence too!

The casino is Playtech (often software of choice for rogues that feel they are too "posh" for RTG), god only knows what software the poker room is.

 

[pokeraddict]

god only knows what software the poker room is.

It seems to be developed in house as PKR Limited. According to Poker Site Scout the company and server are based in Alderney.

 

[vinylweatherman]

It seems to be developed in house as PKR Limited. According to Poker Site Scout the company and server are based in Alderney.

Well, at least this means their server is where they say it is.

What kind of CS and management treat a 62 year old woman like that!!!
One truly regulated by both the Alderney and UK gambling commissions - I find that hard to believe, it is the sort of thing I would expect to see from "sham" licencing juristictions, such as Costa Rica, and in some respects Kahnawake.

The first thing Max perhaps should do is check that these licence claims are genuine, as if they are not, we can be certain this is a rogue site without further ado. Why won't Alderney list who currently has a licence, it would make it far harder for dodgy operators to stick up the logo when they have no right to. I was on the Alderney site for 20 mins looking for a link to such a list, and it was nowhere to be found.

 

[topoor]

They are claiming to be licensed by Alderney. The email I received advised me to complain to them if I am unhappy.

"As informed in your chat with Motie, if you wish to make a formal complaint regarding our decision then please contact Alderney at [email protected] ."

The offical line from PKR when asked to explain what I have done wrong is:

motie: I do not dicuss abuse technic with customers or past customers.

Motie Bring is the head of transaction services.

 

[Rhyzz]

They may consider 'abuse' to be the fact that you deposited, withdrew, deposited & withdrew.

So long as the terms of the bonus were met, they cannot take the funds from you, although they can stop you from receiving offers in future. If they didn't then they would be mugs, but still.....

PKR going through some bad times at the moment anyway from what I hear. Their poker is no longer unique, Ladbrokes and Pokerwize offer a similar product with much higher liquidity and traffic going through the tables. They have launched the Casino probably knowing nothing about the industry and thinking it's going to be a nice easy way to make a little bit of cash.

Another site ruining the name of Playtech!!

 

[topoor]

What I find most disgraceful here is the attitude of PKR and its staff. They refuse to discuss this with me and the only explanation they offer is "bonus abuse". This is such a wide ranging term and it is one that is totally at their discretion. It is definately suspicious behaviour.

 

[topoor]

I have been trying to get some answers this morning as they have confirmed receipt of my documents by live chat. But they now refuse to communicate with me by chat yet it is a recognised method of communication for them and they have now blocked me from accessing it.

Victoria: Hi , My name is Victoria Dornan, I am The Head of Client Services
Me: Hello
Me: I am trying to ascertain when my money will be returned to me
Me: I have been treated disgracefully by your staff and company
Victoria: I would like to speak with you personally about this
Me: I have made a formal complaint to Alderney and posted on the casinomeister website
Victoria: Please can you provide me with a telephone number
Me: I will not discuss this issue by any media that does not ensure record keeping
Me: I have done nothing wrong yet I have been abused and victimised. I am 62 years old and retired
Me: I do not deserve this treatment
Victoria: Unless you can provide a phone number I can not discuss this further
Me: Please explain why?
Victoria: You have come through to the Head of Department so you can not go any higher
Me: I would have thought that a reputable company would be happy to communicate officially.
Me: Please clearly explain why you will not communicate with me in writing?
Victoria: I only deal with customers personally
Victoria: by telephone
Me: I only deal with frauds when records can be kept
Victoria: so unless you can provide me your number i will have to terminate this discussion
Me: I would advise you to think very carefully about that
Victoria: if you would like something in writing that is absolutely no problem
Victoria: We will write to you by email
Me: As I have stated I will not communicate by any media that a record cannot be kept of
Victoria: sure
Victoria: we will write to you
Me: I am offended that you will not speak to my reasonably
Me: *me
Victoria: so for now please be patient while we work this though and we will write to you
Me: No
Victoria: you have 2 options , either let me speak with you in a professional manner or we will write to you
Me: Please explain this situation to me.
Victoria: which option would you like to take?
Me: A professional manner is in writing. Why are you so insistent on no records
Victoria: ok then I will leave this conversation now and we will write to you
Victoria: thank you for your patience
Me: NO
Victoria: good bye
Me: Please explain why you refuse to use a vehicle that your
info: Chat session has been terminated by the site operator.

Of course at this point I will not communicate by any means other than in writing because I get the feeling that I will need evidence to support anything that is said. The live chat would be useful as it would allow discussion. Obiviously something that they are only interested in when there are no records.

 

[topoor]

I have sent an email to the Alderney Gambling Commission and copied in [email protected]. 30 mins later I received my original deposit back. Before I realised they had given me the refund I went to a local internet cafe and managed to get onto live chat.

Unbeliveable:

me: I do not appreciate being disconnected mid sentence
me: I also do not appreciate being blocked from accessing the live chat
me: I have an ongoing issue and I want to discuss it
Peter: this is because there is nothing further for CS to discuss with you
Peter: you have lodged a complaint with the AGCC
Peter: all further correspondence must be with them
Peter: as per their rules
me: Their rules state that you should discuss the issue with the partu concerned
me: and try to resolve the issue
me: The AGCC has been alerted to your disgraceful behaviour
me: At this time it is an alert
me: Whilst you have my money I will not go away
Peter: Motie has informed me that the remaining balance on your account has been sent to your moneybookers account, total: 515
me: You have told me that I will receive my money back so I am trying to find out when
Peter: we are, of course, retaining the bonus
Peter: so i recommend that you check your MB account
me: ANd you still refuse to explain why?
Peter: We're not authorised to explain in detail for security reasons
me: Then I will do my best to disgrace your company in public
me: I have already begun. You will NOT get away with this. Evryone wil know
Peter: look at it this way; if by some chance you actually don't know how to abuse our bonuses - there's no way we're about to tell you how
me: I look at it as theft
Peter: theft how? we've sent your money back
Peter: we just retained our own
Peter: check your moneybookers account
me: HOW?
me: You fraudulently got me to deposit and wager
me: You then refused to provide the incentive or bonus
me: YOU ARE SIMPLY CHEATS
Peter: bonuses are not a consumer right, your decisions are your own
me: Oh no no no
Peter: no no no?
me: You refusing to provide the bonus is exactly the same as you refusing to pay a winning bet
me: You promised me that you would pay me $250 if I wagered 10000 on allowed games
me: End of story you cheated
Peter: let's take a look at what you agreed to when using the bonus:
Peter: "PKRCasino reserves the right to withdraw or amend this offer at any time, without prior notice. The decision of the PKRCasino management team is final and no correspondence will be entered into."
Peter: they're found in full here:
Peter: Outdated URL (Invalid)
Peter: we are perfectly within our rights
me: Withdraw or amend the offer not renege
Peter: withdraw
Peter: ...
me: Withdraw does not mean remove once it has been awarded
Peter: and section 9:
Peter: PKRCasino reserves the right to withhold any bonus payment if it believes that the promotion has been abused and/or where the terms of the offer are not fulfilled, or any irregular wagering patterns are found.
me: I am well aware of your terms
me: and none of them exscuse or explain your actions
Peter: then you know why it is impossible to accuse us of cheating
me: Your regulator will find in my favour
me: It is not
me: CHEATS
Peter: Is there anything else I can help you with?
me: I will also be complaining to the Police and the ASA
me: You will not get away with this.
Peter: I will not get away with what?
Peter: informing you of the situation?
Peter: Is there anything else I can help you with?
me: You will not get away with defrauding me
Peter: nobody has defrauded you, we provided a service, you used it - we've even sent your money back rather than seizing it
me: I would have loved to see you try and seize it
Peter: when you break the terms & conditions of account use, there are consequences
Peter: Is there anything else I can help you with?
me: Please explain which terms and condtions I broke?
me: Becasue I am still waiting to know
Peter: I'm not authorised to discuss it in detail, as mentioned above;
Peter: if by some chance you actually don't know how to abuse our bonuses - there's no way we're about to tell you how
me: I do hope you are embarrassed
Peter: Is there anything else I can help you with?
me: Well done, you have cheated a 62 year old woman
Peter: you have your money back
Peter: we've cheated no-one
me: As I stated this issue will not go away. I am retired and can devote my entire energy to resolving this
me: You have cheated me
me: You owe me $250
Peter: and as such, all correspondence must take place between yourself and the AGCC from now on
Peter: Customer Support can no longer help you in such cases of financial dispute
me: I recommend you visit the casinomeister site
Peter: we will continue to refuse your chats and block any connections you make to Live Chat
me: you can explain your actions to the gambling world there
Peter: why not just post this next to your comments:
Peter: "PKRCasino reserves the right to withhold any bonus payment if it believes that the promotion has been abused and/or where the terms of the offer are not fulfilled, or any irregular wagering patterns are found."
me: I have already posted it
Peter: it seems fairly self-explanatory
Peter: ok grand
Peter: Is there anything else I can help you with?
me: Most people are appalled
me: They call it an FU clause which gives you carte blanche to behave as you will
me: Unacceptable in the gaming world apparantly
me: and extremely frowned upon by regulators
Peter: well thanks for giving the opinions of your forum buddies
Peter: Is there anything else I can help you with?
me: Is there any other insults you would like to make to the casinomeister site viewers?\
me: This whole chat will be posted there
Peter: i meant no insult, i was thanking you for your (and their) feedback


Under no circumstances can I or will I let this drop now that I have my deposit back. They way they have treated me and spoken to me is disgraceful. They seem to think they have the right to "seize" money! As far as I am aware only the goverment has the power to do that! Who do these people think they are?

 

[vinylweatherman]

Their resoning holds no water, don't forget:-

Last week I signed up for a new account with PKR Casino. I deposited $200 and received the signup bonus. I wagered around $10000 on Casino Holdem and withdrew my money with no problems. A day later I received an email from PKR inviting me to partake in another promotion. This time a 50% reload bonus of $250. Ideposited $500 and again wagered around $10000 on Casino Holdem. This time I did much better and won around $300 when the bonus was released. I withdrew again.

They INVITED you PERSONALLY to take the promotion, and they knew full well how you were likely to play it, and you played it in exactly the same way as the first time, which was within the rules.

They have acted against the rules of Alderney because you were INVITED to this second offer, you did not just "take" it. While they can show you the door, they CANNOT go back on a bet they have already accepted just because you won. If Alderney say they can, then they will lose a hell of a lot of respect here, as they probably already have by allowing PKR to behave in this incredibly rude manner to players, where Alderney rules actually REQUIRE them to have a proper and fair internal procedure rather than simply refusing to discuss the matter.

The invitation itself can be referred to the Advertising Standards Agency, since it was a false offer, and should not have been made to a player who they thought might be taking advantage of them.

Since this involves Casino Hold'em, and with modest bets between $1 and $5, I find it hard to work out where this "bonus abuse" argument is coming from. They are clearly up to something else, which may explain their unusual reluctance to deal with this matter internally between casino and player.

I was right about one thing though, it only took 30Mins to at least get your own money back after "name dropping" Alderney and Casinomeister

The fight for the winnings will be harder, but this issue will not go away until a proper explanation as to how a 62 year old woman managed to abuse a bonus with $5 bets on Casino Hold'em is forthcoming - this sounds like normal play to me, and you simply got lucky - you could just as easily have lost, and I bet the casino wouldn't be complaining, and would most likely have sent you a third bonus offer.

 

[topoor]

Thanks for your post Vinylweatherman. I have received a response from Alderney advising that they are investigating and that I should not try to communicate with PKR as they will do that on my behalf. I urge anyone (BlizeH?) who has had similar experiences to contact Alderney and make a complaint as in numbers I feel we will have some success.

 

[vinylweatherman]

Thanks for your post Vinylweatherman. I have received a response from Alderney advising that they are investigating and that I should not try to communicate with PKR as they will do that on my behalf. I urge anyone (BlizeH?) who has had similar experiences to contact Alderney and make a complaint as in numbers I feel we will have some success.

That's good news. It would be worth sending a PM to Max so that he knows Alderney are investigating, as it might be worth his while waiting on that before duplicating effort through the PAB process.

Hopefully, Alderney will find out what is REALLY going on here, as the tale simply does not make sense, not even the posted chat logs, where they contradict themselves all the time.

Regulators do not allow "F U Clauses" to be invoked without very good reason. The fact that such terms exist does not make them legal, and Alderney can overrule this term, and force them to remove it if they believe it has been used on a player whose only crime was being lucky.

I am still a little puzzled as to how they can be licenced with Alderney, yet not exist on the Alderney site under the name that appears on their licence.
I DID eventually find a full list of licences issued the year before, 2005, and a list of applicants. Not a whiff of PKR in any form at all.

Their response does though indicate they ARE licenced there, as if they were not, the last thing they would want is to have you engage with the official disputes process with Alderney, whereupon they would be found out.
They must hold their licence under a different name.

 

[GaryWatson]

They are listed here

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[blizeH]

Seems I have to wait for the security checks to be processed before they can discuss the promotions issue - they're sure taking their sweet time with it though!

 

[blizeH]

Following a review of your account activity, we believe you have been abusing the casino bonus offer.

Your account has been closed in accordance with the bonus terms and conditions.

As you have now sent in verification documentation we will be processing your account balance, minus the bonus amount, back to your registered deposit method.

We will consider reopening your account if you agree to use our casino or poker games in the spirit they are meant to be played, however you will remain excluded from all future bonuses.

Regards,

Tony
PKR Security Team
[email protected]

They've refunded me my money minus the $250 bonus - not sure if I have a case or if it's worth even disputing it?

 

[topoor]

Well BlizeH my question to you would be did you abuse the bonus? Or did you as I did make an invited deposit in good faith, wager the required amount on allowed games and then withdraw?

If you have done nothing wrong I strongly urge you to send an email to Alderney. It will take 5 minutes and along with my email it could prevent a rogue casino from behaving in this manner.

In a further unbelievable development my moneybookers account has been closed. Moneybookers wont reveal further details except to say that they have received a complaint from an unnamed merchant. As PKR is the only recent merchant I have used it is obviously them.

I am shocked and appalled at this spiteful act from PKR. In addtion I am very disappointed with moneybookers who being a financial institution should ensure that they behave impecabbly and only with proof.

I have advised Alderney of this as it is surely rogue behaviour and am going to file a formal complaint to the FSA regarding moneybookers actions.

All this beacuse of that damn PKR. I wish I had never heard of them and cant say strongly enough.

DO NOT PLAY AT PKR CASINO.

 

[SirDaniel]

Hi iam new here, but read since 9 month

i also play this reload at pkr and made a withdrawl of 920 $,
i was banned quickly and they told they removed my bonus and gave back my deposit.

i get today 420 $, that means only the winnings, are they drunken O.o

i hope that with this publicity we can get our hole money back...

thx very nice forum here btw

 

[topoor]

Sir Daniel, please either PAB or make a formal complaint to Alderney. I can give you all the contact details if you wish. If you really want to get your money and make these people pay then that is the best way. I am really encouraged by this thread as we now have three people who have suffered the same treatment. We cant all be fraudsters.

Moneybookers are you listening?

 

[Roar]

Moneybookers are you listening?

Sounds like you are pursuing this topoor in the correct manner.

The Moneybookers angle is disconcerting. I would be chasing down a 'Freedom of Information' application (or it's equivalent) firstly from Moneybookers and then from FSA.

My understanding is that institutions such as Moneybookers MUST disclose ALL information that it records on you within it's database.

Upon disclosure of the information you can take the next step including seeking redress of inaccurate or libelous information.

>

 

[topoor]

Roar, thats a very good suggestion. In England it might be covered under the data protection act. It just depends whether moneybookers are covered under fraud prevention legisaltion as to whether or not I could successfully demand it.

I will look into this.

 

[maxd]

Sir Daniel, please either PAB or make a formal complaint to Alderney. ...

Go here if you are interested in the Pitch-A-Bitch process: Past PABs

Or here if you'd like to see the sort of things we've handled in the past: Past PABs

 

[vinylweatherman]

Well BlizeH my question to you would be did you abuse the bonus? Or did you as I did make an invited deposit in good faith, wager the required amount on allowed games and then withdraw?

If you have done nothing wrong I strongly urge you to send an email to Alderney. It will take 5 minutes and along with my email it could prevent a rogue casino from behaving in this manner.

In a further unbelievable development my moneybookers account has been closed. Moneybookers wont reveal further details except to say that they have received a complaint from an unnamed merchant. As PKR is the only recent merchant I have used it is obviously them.

I am shocked and appalled at this spiteful act from PKR. In addtion I am very disappointed with moneybookers who being a financial institution should ensure that they behave impecabbly and only with proof.

I have advised Alderney of this as it is surely rogue behaviour and am going to file a formal complaint to the FSA regarding moneybookers actions.

All this beacuse of that damn PKR. I wish I had never heard of them and cant say strongly enough.

DO NOT PLAY AT PKR CASINO.

This situation with Moneybookers points to this being much more than a bonus issue. They most likely have accused you of fraud or money laundering activities. "abusing" bonuses is simply the OPINION of the casino where a player has obeyed all the rules, yet has appeared to have played to win, rather than extend playing time. Passing this information to Moneybookers is an illegal act, as this is your "personal data", and they have damaged your reputation, and can now be taken to court for Libel. A complaint can also be sent not to the Alderney Gambling commission, but to the Alderney government's department that regulates the handling of personal data.
As for Moneybookers, it would be a request under the Data Protection act, enclosing 10 for disclosure of all data held about you. Further, you should get a credit report (don't hurry though, it will take some time for this incident to appear if it is going to). Three agencies handle this, and it costs 2 to get a report from all three - total outlay 16.

Given that is seems that PKR are pulling this "bonus abuse" excuse with a number of players, I am left wondering whether Alderney is becoming another Kahnawake, albeit a UK whitelisted one.

I do not understand why I was unable to navigate to the full list of licence holders, I went round in cirlces for 20 minutes, and I DID try that link first.

We can now judge Alderney on the SPEED at which they address this, as having a Moneybookers account summarily closed before any investigation has taken place seems like rogue action, and should prejudice PKR's position if it turns out to have been them (they knew that the dispute process was ongoing, yet caused an adverse report to go to a third party before Alderney had ruled on the case).

 

[Nifty29]

What a shocking situation this one is. PKR should be closed down immediately if Alderney wants to maintain any image of fairness and reliability in protecting players.

It also seems that many casinos are taking a different view on 'bonus abuse' lately....

A few weeks back I received $100 NO DEPOSIT loyalty bonus (as I was an EliteVIP) from This Is Vegas and played for a while and lost etc (as you do ). A few days later, I deposited a small amount and cashed out a few hundred bucks. The next day I receive an email from John (TIV manager) stating that I was a 'bonus abuser' and that I was banned from all further promotional offers.

What the??

Its interesting to note that I ONLY play slots and the high variance ones at that..AND they sent me $100 FREE a few days earlier. In my opinion, the former 400Group casinos have lost the plot. I only play at SlotoCash nowadays as they pay super fast and always send me a freebie when Im losing (and sometimes even when Im winning!).

Im sorry to derail a little here, but with the topic being 'bonus abuse' I thought it was relevant.

Hope everyone gets paid from PKR!

 

[blizeH]

If I wish to dispute this and hopefully get the $250 from the reload bonus back, who should I contact? Alderney?

Cheers

 

[topoor]

I would suggest that you contact Kelly Spencer at Alderney. The email address is [email protected].
This is the person dealing with my complaint.

My pab here at Casinomeister is on hold pending the decision of Alderney so I believe it would make sense to have all copmplaints dealt with at the same time and by the same body to ensure the speediest resolution.

As no decision has yet been reached by Alderney it can only strengthen both our cases if you submit your complaint to them.

 

[Rodmania]

I also get bonus banned, i play all different games, but i am a bonus abuser???
I send my documents for verfication but they do not gave back my deposit, they stolen me also bucks from this.

I made a PAB

I hope we all get our money and winnings back, tahts such a shame...

 

[Rhyzz]

Simple fact of the matter is this...

Someone who plays Slots or Casino Hold'em is not a bonus abuser. They may be a bonus seeker, but that is for a Casino to decide and to prevent them from claiming any further offers.

PKR are on very dangerous ground here, if everything that top has said is true and there is nothing being left out, Alderney should have sense enough to make them pay up and get them to seriously review their retention policies.

 

[topoor]

Only thing I have left out is this official email from PKR.

Your documents have been cleared by my team, as discussed yesterday, we will refund to your Moneybookers account the remaining of the account balance minus the bonus.

I understand that you have raised a complaint with Alderney with regard to the bonus issue, I will wait for Alderney to raise this matter with me.



Best regards,



Motie Bring

Head of Transaction Services

PKR TECHNOLOGIES

 

[vinylweatherman]

Only thing I have left out is this official email from PKR.

Your documents have been cleared by my team, as discussed yesterday, we will refund to your Moneybookers account the remaining of the account balance minus the bonus.

I understand that you have raised a complaint with Alderney with regard to the bonus issue, I will wait for Alderney to raise this matter with me.



Best regards,



Motie Bring

Head of Transaction Services

PKR TECHNOLOGIES

This still leaves the unanswered question of the sudden closure of your Moneybookers account, as well as their refusal to say which term was broken, with their inferrence that this is information that would "help" with further abuse (fraud?) at the casino site.

If they can come up with an explanation as to how your playing pattern breaches the "spirit" of their promotion, let alone the terms and conditions, why have they not done so, even with what looks like a mass of complaints landing at Alderney.

It would be best if ALL players caught up in this go straight to Alderney, and forget about PAB for the moment. This will give the Alderney commission the chance to see the big picture, and the casino cannot then claim that this was an "isolated incident" - something many companies try when caught lacking by watchdog authorities.
Alderney will have a different view than the casino, and PKR will have to explain "bonus abuse" as applied to casino hold'em, and worse still, for SLOTS!!!!
If ANY promotion is offered to a player, or is advertised as available without restrictions, they cannot justify action purely because a player claimed the offer.
Alderney will also realise that the eyes of the wider player community are on them, and they would not want to lose their trust at this early stage, less than a year since the UK brought in the regulations that gave Alderney their EU wide status as being able to offer licences that clear the holders to freely market within much of the EU.

 

[lauram]

How does a casino get the power to have one of our accounts closed such as moneybookers and so on. As long as moneybookers was funded and casino got their funds how in the world does the casino have any power to have her moneybookers account closed. While back i had a instadebit prob with a casino trying to pay me, in the long run it was my error in not doing something instadebit asked, but not once during that time did i think this casino could turn around and say hey instadebit dont allow her to use her account. GOOD LUCK
with this keep us posted.

 

[topoor]

My latest communication from Moneybookers sheds no light on this either. The only conclusion I can come to is that PKR either a, lied to Moneybookers and told them that they had flat out caught me in a frauduelent act or b, are unhappy with me for complaining to Alderney and posting here that they have used their power as a merchant at Moneybooker to insist that I am punished for such behaviour. Perhaps this has something to do with it "PKR is the webs fastest growing online poker room with over 1million players signed up within its first year – a record for the online gaming industry. "

As can be shown by the email from Motie Bring of PKR my identity has been verified and my deposit + $17 winnings returned so there is zero chance that they have caught me committing fraud.

I would like to think that Moneybookers themselved have been decieved but given the recent correspondence and the lack of openness or discussion I am not so sure.


Dear Mrs. *******,

Thank you for contacting the Moneybookers Service.

Please be advised that we have already revealed all information about your case and this is the actual information that we are obligated by law to provide our customers with. Moneybookers cannot reveal any of its internal security procedures. However, please note that our Security Department will gladly assist with additional information, if contacted by the authorities. Once again, we would like to confirm the decision that you can no longer use our services. In case you are not satisfied with the manner your case was handled, you can file an official complaint against Moneybookers. Please find attached all the necessary information regarding this matter.

We hope you'll find this information useful.

Best regards,

Theodor

Team Leader Moneybookers Service

I have written to Alderney today asking for an update. It may well be too early and I have not received a reply but I intend to ask for weekly updates and will expect some progress reports.

 

[topoor]

I have received a reply from Alderney stating that they are waiting for my game history from PKR and that they will be able to make a decision following its receipt.

They have also advised that the best email address for them is [email protected] not the one posted earlier.

If you have emailed them at the earlier posted address it will be a good idea to resend to [email protected].

Hopefully this wont take to much longer.

 

[Fleur-De-Lis]

Just a thought: if topoor is from USA, and used moneybookers for gambling purposes, may be it was enough for PKR to report this fact, and have account closed?

Furthermore, it is strictly forbidden for citizens or residents of certain countries such as but not limited to the United States of America, Turkey, China, Malaysia or Israel to send payments to websites offering gambling services such as sports betting, casino games and pokers games. Moneybookers reserves the right in its own discretion to amend the list of countries where it is prohibited to send payments to gambling activities as described above.

 

[topoor]

I live in England and have never accessed the internet from any other country.

 

[kernow]

Someone who plays Slots or Casino Hold'em is not a bonus abuser.

They are if they use a bot to play for them.

 

[topoor]

Not that it applies in my case but on the advice of a friend who has advised me that PKR probably thought I was using a bot I have checked the terms and conditions of the offer and Bot play is not specifically excluded.

So technically they wouldnt be bonus abusers. Even if PKR did believe that, it doesnt explain moneybookers or PKR's refusal to explain their decsion.

I suppose if any casino suspected bot play they could invoke the "FU" clause but they would surely need proof such as a 12 hour straight minimum coins session without beaks?

 

[Fleur-De-Lis]

I live in England and have never accessed the internet from any other country.

I see, glad I was wrong. Did you try to call Moneybookers? I found out you can get more info over the telephone with them, if you clench your teeth and try to be friendly

Customer Call Centre:
Monday - Friday 9:00 - 18:00 GMT International: +44 870 383 0232
UK: 0905 848 0011 (calls cost 25p / minute)

 

[topoor]

Yes I rang them. The people on the phone are friendly enough but they wont let you speak to Security or Management so you can get nowhere. I followed their advice and sent in details of my case and its subsequent complaint but to no avail.

 

[vinylweatherman]

Yes I rang them. The people on the phone are friendly enough but they wont let you speak to Security or Management so you can get nowhere. I followed their advice and sent in details of my case and its subsequent complaint but to no avail.

Since you have received a "deadlock letter" (Email in your case), you should now complain to the relevant authorities. This may well be the Financial Ombudsman here in the UK, since Moneybookers have suspended an important service for an internet gambler (legal here in UK), and there has been no evidence that you have broken T & C, and you suspect a "spiteful" complaint from a merchant (PKR) simply because you lodged a complaint with the Alderney licencing authorities about their arbitrary reneging on a bet without explanation to you.

It is great that Alderney are looking at playlogs, they will be able to gain their own impression as to whether you broke the terms and conditions of the offers.

Now it is time to pursue Moneybookers through the Financial Ombudsman while you wait on Alderney.

Neteller would be a good alternative for online gambling. The fees are higher, but phone support is FREE. Currently, Barclaycard is good for internet gambling if you play in UK Pounds, no fees - treated as ordinary purchases. Withdrawals will come back to the Barclaycard as they are in the "OCT Scheme". Other withdrawals though, would have to be by cheque, which might be a nuisance.

 

[c_note]

Moneyhookers.. I mean bookers

Vinyl was right. MB T&C's state :

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

3.6. Company will ensure that all personal details of the Customer are held in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Company's published privacy statement.

13.2. The Financial Ombudsman Service applies to Moneybookers' e-money scheme. Customer may refer complaints that are eligible to be referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service to the Financial Ombudsman if a matter cannot be resolved in accordance with Moneybookers' standard complaint handling procedures. Information regarding our internal complaint handling procedures and the Financial Ombudsman Service can be requested by contacting Moneybookers’ customer service department.

The Financial Ombudsman Service is available from

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

The relevant Data Protection act section is :

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

I was going to check the pkr site to see if they are provided to operate under the data protection act, but their site is down for maintenance. It should be in their Privacy Policy or Terms & Conditions.


Good luck..

 

[Roar]

I have received a reply from Alderney stating that they are waiting for my game history from PKR and that they will be able to make a decision following its receipt.

Hopefully this wont take to much longer.

Very strange chronology of events.

Did Alderney not mention the basis on which PKR are justifying their confiscation of funds ("bonus abuse" requires definition if it indeed does exist)?

Looking at game history might be akin to looking at Tea Leaves. What on earth are they expecting to see in the Tea Leaves?

If per chance a "bot" is seen in the Tea Leaves should Alderney not then seek your further representations before arriving at a decision? (Wow! You can just imagine the ramifications of an adverse player ruling.)

Having said that it does seem Alderney are moving with some haste toward a thankfully timely resolution which puts the likes of Malta LGA to an absolute shame.

Keep us updated topoor - it's better than watching TV.

>

 

[Rodmania]

Hi,

good news

for 20 minutes i get 250 $ from PKr after my first cash back from 420 $
so in total they must me get "only" 250 $ for my 920 $ total.

I hope they will credited in the next days, i email them the situation, but this is the right step

I will inform you

 

[spearmaster]

They are if they use a bot to play for them.

Seeing as that Playtech slots have autoplay built in, and autoplay is essentially a bot, I think we can safely say that this statement is incorrect.

 

[topoor]

Did Alderney not mention the basis on which PKR are justifying their confiscation of funds ("bonus abuse" requires definition if it indeed does exist)?

>

No, the statement simply read:

"At present the AGCC are in the progress of retrieving your gaming history so that we can assess it. Once we have done this we should be able to make an informed decision regarding your complaint."