external image

Prime Casino remove my money from Neteller!

bash_2357

Banned User - violation forum rule 1.9 - multiple
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Location
london
Ok,

So here are the facts. I signed up to Prime under Old t+c . i.e deposit 100, bonus 100 and wager 30 times slots ( or other variations - usual MG rules). I played 5 Deuces Wild , Didn't abuse the bonus in any way and luckily hit a RF-balance shot up to 1130.

Withdrew within the t+c, bonus forfeited and Money in my neteller account 1030, 3 days later. Excellent i hear you cry.

Two weeks later, Neteller inform me that Prime taken the money back from my neteller account. No word from the casino.

Spent the last two days chasing CS at Prime and they will not back down. I even have a screenshot of the terms i used when i signed up and played. It is true that their t+c changed around the same time as i was playing, but when exactly that kicked in is not clear. I know i checked the bonus conditions the night before and took a screenshot. This is clearly a grey area here but they are naturally favouring themselves.

Customer Service are adamant they will not pay me. They have voided my winnings are prepared to return only my deposit. I have said that i am prepared to wager the balance 30 times on slots if necessary. As a extra kick in the teeth the email says that i can get the bonus again and 'you never know your luck might still be in '. P. take as far as i can see.

Normally, casinos return your balance back to your account and ask you to complete the wagering but not here.I find this particularly harsh

I have pitched a bitch but am very disappointed with the outcome. I feel i have been doubly hit by neteller and by Prime.

My advise would be to avoid Prime Casino.

Any thoughts.
 
Yes, the OP has raised this in "other" as a Neteller complaint.

While casinos have been known to void winnings, this case is most disturbing, as they voided winnings and recovered the winnings already paid some two weeks later from the player's Neteller account.
It seems odd that the withdrawal passed audit, and only two weeks later the money was taken from the players own personal Neteller account. This is an example of Prime casino doing a chargeback in reverse, since the withdrawal had already been paid and credited.
This is no different to a player making a deposit, and later deciding they didn't like the way the games played and charging back through their credit card.
if this is considered so "evil" when a player does it, how come it is an acceptable way for a casino to get it's own way in a dispute (after all, that is what it is).
It looks like the withdrawal was passed by audit under the old terms, but was reconsidered under the new terms some two weeks later, and recovered.

This is a HUGE issue, it means ANY casino can arbitarily recover a payment after the fact from a player's Neteller account just because they "feel like it".
Neteller did nothing for the player here, they took the casino at it's word that there had been an error, without reference to the player.
After this action, no player should feel guilty for resolving a dispute in a similar manner. If it's fair for a casino to do this, it is equally fair for the other party to the contract to follow suit where there is a dispute.
As always, the party who has the money has a huge advantage in a dispute situation, and this "theft" changed this to the casino having the advantage.

This player's playcheck and Cashcheck records will show whether they deposited under old or new terms, not forgetting that it is the terms at the time of deposit and bonus claim that matter, not any terms a couple of weeks later after the withdrawal has already been paid.

This is the second time we have had an accredited casino embroiled in shady practice this year, not including the unresponsive Pharoahs.

Even if the casino are able to show they were right, making a chargeback through Neteller is a dirty game, and quite possible illegal, as recovery of disputed funds has to be sanctioned by the courts, not arbitarily by one party. This is one reason why chargebacks are hated when players do them to get money from casinos that they knowingly deposited and lost.
 
Here are the terms currently on the Prime casino website for the SUB.
It is a standard EZBonus,
This is what is said about VP (where the disputed win arose). No problem therefore with how the win was made.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
100% - all Slots, American Roulette and all Parlor Games
50% - all Table Pokers, Red Dog, all Roulettes (excluding American Roulette), Casino War and Sic Bo
10% - all Video/Power Pokers (except All Aces Video/Power Pokers), all Blackjacks (except Classic Blackjack), all Craps and all Baccarats
2% - Classic Blackjack and All Aces Video/Power Pokers
NOTE: Playthrough ( betting) is liable to use the Gamble Feature on Slots or the Double Feature on Video/Power Pokers this is exempt from playthrough requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

In terms of making an eventual withdrawal:-

Only from the Cash Account can withdrawals be made and these can be made only after the wagering requirements have been fully met. Otherwise, no withdrawals can be made.

Under MG EZBonus, this additional term is implemented in the software, and any attempt to withdraw will be met with a banking screen error stating that WR has not been met. I have seen this myself (as a software error) when Casino Action changed over to EZBonus without properly clearing "ghost" WR from the system.
This looks like the "new" term, however, if the player was able to withdraw, then this term had not yet been implemented in the back end systems. This would explain why the withdrawal went through in the first instance.
Since the casino is responsibe for ensuring it's own back end systems are kept up to date, they should not hold the player responsible. Had they done their job properly, it would have been impossible for the player to breach this term due to the software block and error message, which would have allowed the player to query this with support, who would have advised of the reason, namely that all bonus balance must be converted (WR fully completed).
The OP states that the bonus was removed, this again implies the system incorrectly allowed the withdrawal through, and it took 2 weeks for the casino to find out, and then they pulled a "stunt" on the players Neteller account.
This looks like the terms changed not at the time of deposit, but near simultaneously with the time of withdrawal (unless the OP withdrew on the same day).
Terms are also undated (no reference to an expiry date), so the player would be under no obligation to reassess the terms page until 30 days has elapsed from the previous read through, or where directed to do so on a future offer. A previous case like this went in the favour of Trident Lounge because the promotional terms stated "valid until.......", and the player deposited the day after this expiry, and thus should have checked the new terms. In this case, this change would have gone unnoticed by any player till they checked again, and I would assume the OP checked the terms before playing, and didn't see the need to check them every day or so just in case a change had been made.


####################################################
Promotion Terms and conditions
Rules
An account is made up of a Cash Account and a Bonus Account. You can't withdraw from the Bonus Account; however, this account can be used to place bets with. Only from the Cash Account can withdrawals be made and these can be made only after the wagering requirements have been fully met. Otherwise, no withdrawals can be made.
Betting requirements (or playthroughs) are shown in the terms and conditions of each promotion.


Terms & Conditions
Any amounts shown as bonus amounts are placed in the Bonus Account subject to thirty (30) times playthrough before they can be removed.

As different games are played this could well affect the contribution or percentage of the playthrough requirement possibly up to 100%,

- The contributing percentages are as follows:


100% - all Slots, American Roulette and all Parlor Games
50% - all Table Pokers, Red Dog, all Roulettes (excluding American Roulette), Casino War and Sic Bo
10% - all Video/Power Pokers (except All Aces Video/Power Pokers), all Blackjacks (except Classic Blackjack), all Craps and all Baccarats
2% - Classic Blackjack and All Aces Video/Power Pokers
NOTE: Playthrough ( betting) is liable to use the Gamble Feature on Slots or the Double Feature on Video/Power Pokers this is exempt from playthrough requirements.

As the playthrough requirements are met, funds are automatically transferred from the Bonus Account to the Cash Account in denominations of 10 credits at a time.

Playthrough is only possible when real money bets are made,

In this instant Real money bets are taken from the Cash Account. Should there be no cash available, the bets are deducted from the Bonus Account. The funds in the Bonus Account can only be utilized if there are no or little credits in the cash balance.

Winnings on bets made from the Cash Account are sent directly to the Cash Account. However, if you have opted in for the bonus, you will be unable to withdraw any amount from your account until you've either met the wagering requirements. Winnings on bets for the Bonus Account after the wagering requirements have been met go straight to the Cash Account.

Should a Players Bonus Account together with his winnings mean that the Bonus Account balance exceeds the size of the original bonus amount; the excess winnings are automatically added to the Players Cash Account.

Note: Less any automatic transfer costs from the Bonus Account to the Cash Account, charged.

The Player acknowledges that in order to be eligible for any promotion or bonus they must be playing with the primary currency used in the country where they have a registered address and are playing from. The casino reserves the right to withhold bonuses and any winnings resulting from deposits in any currency made in contradiction to this condition. An exception is made for USD and CAD to this clause.
 
A second player mentioned a similar problem to me a couple days ago, in which Prime Casino removed his winnings from Neteller.

Support tells me that early this month, Prime changed their early withdrawal rules. They used to require players to withdraw their cash balance at any point, like a traditional Clearplay. Now they require players to complete the full playthrough. They seem to have implemented this rule change in a strange way. I believe they told Neteller the early withdrawal payments were made in error and requested that Neteller return the payments back to the casino.

If players did sign-up and play before the rule change, clearly the original rules should be applied. If players signed up and played after the rule change and the payments were truly made in error, then the situation is more complex. While the casino is justified in having the new rules applied, taking money from Neteller accounts is a questionable way of applying this. These players should at least have the opportunity to complete wagering.
 
Last edited:

This is more true, as if this rule change had been PROPERLY implemented, it would be impossible for this sorry situation to arise in the first place.
Also, why did the new terms not get picked up at audit. Surely if the casinos own processing team were not aware of this change, how on earth can the casino even think it is wrong for players not to be aware.
It seems that this is not even a precedent, it is seemingly quite OK for any casino to claw back funds from a players personal Neteller account. This is like a shop giving the wrong change, and five minutes later realising and running down the street and mugging the customer to retrieve the error from his wallet. If it is the customer who is diddled, the rules differ, in that once they leave the shop a dispute over change will not be entered into.

This is simply unfair double standards, both of the hypothetical shopkeeper, and Prime Casino. I wonder how many other covert raids they have done on players Neteller accounts, and Neteller have simply allowed it.
I have not even seen this with the rogues, once players get paid, they tend to stay paid. I expect the rogues will cotton on to this ploy, make a big show of resolving a dispute, and a couple of weeks later, when the fuss has dies down, snatching the payment back from Neteller.

If the casino went so far as to pay these withdrawals, they should live with it, not trick Neteller into returning the funds by claiming "error". This is a perversion of this procedure, it is meant to be used when a party inadvertently makes a payment twice, not as a means to sneak a chargeback through Neteller, who do not permit chargebacks as a rule.
When a player earlier posted about a fraud on their Neteller, Neteller said the money was in another Neteller account, but claimed they could not recover it without the agreement of the other party, so what is so goddam different in this case that makes Prime able to get this done WITHOUT said permission from the other party.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all your thoughts...

All i want from Prime is for them to give me an opportunity to complete my wagering ( even though i don't need to under the old t+c's).
I am incredibly annoyed about how they clawed back the money from neteller and they had no plan to tell me about it.

Is it a good idea to draw their attention to this thread?
 
Hey Bash, have you PM'd Josh, their manager? From the sounds of it, he's probably already aware of the situation if you've been going back and forth with them. But just thought I'd offer the suggestion in case you haven't. Here's the link.

https://sussexmskpartnershipeast.com/forums/members/
 
Our Terms and Conditions

I'm sorry to hear that some of you are upset about the change in our terms and conditions. Regarding withdrawals from Neteller accounts "after the fact", these payments should never have been made in the first place according to the terms and conditions. I'm sorry that you saw an initial payout but we simply do not allow withdrawals at all until the B*30 is met. Again, I'm sorry if this seems unreasonable but these are the terms and had you deposited prior to these terms taking effect, this situation would not apply to you. In addition, we're not pioneers in this respect either as Playtech seems to generally follow this rule as well. In addition, their requirements are twice as hard to meet.

Again, I apologize for this situation but assuming we're "like every other MGS Casino" is not something I feel we should be responsible for. There are some players from this very forum who will attest to how liberal I am with money but if you haven't read the T&C's, that is really your responsibility. Ultimately, I would like to make it physically impossible to withdraw from the Casino until the wagering requirements are met but as of this moment, it's not possible in the software.

I appreciate that many of you are familiar with the standard Microgaming terms and conditions but you must understand, just because most MGS Casinos follow certain protocols, this does not necessarily mean that we are obligated to do the same.

The bottom line here is quite simple. For those of you who have deposited under the previous T&C's, you have already been able to withdraw and this has not affected you at all. For those of you who deposited afterwards and withdrew prior to meeting your requirements, we have refunded your initial deposit less your bonus and winnings.

I feel that this is more than fair and I apologize to those of you who feel otherwise.
 
Josh, Can you explain why you didn't even have the courtesy to explain to players that you had taken money from their neteller accounts? This is underhand.

Also, a reasonable casino would allow us to complete the wagering not to void all winnings. I am prepared to do this.

There is little doubt that this negative publicity is not going to help Prime. I URGE you to reconsider for the sake of probably a few hundred pounss ( which will be the case after you make me wager it !).

I would really like to know what CM's view on this is?
 


The really big issue here is taking the money out of Neteller without the permission of the player. Had the withdrawals simply been denied at audit, this would have been a standard dispute. The making of the payment was YOUR mistake, as also was the failure to implement the rule change properly such that the bonus system trapped an invalid withdrawal due to remaining WR.
You have set an extremely bad precendent, in effect, funds in Neteller are not safe, any casino, if they feel like it, can decide that they didn't want to make the payment after all and get it back from Neteller.
This could have been far worse, what if in the intervening fortnight the player had deposited the money into another casino and lost it, where would they be then.
This action could well be illegal under UK law, as you did not follow a proper dispute resolution procedure, but effectively just snached the money back.
Under UK law, parties that dispute whether or not a sum of money belongs to the other has to file a dispute if no resolution can be reached between the parties. For this sum, the dispute would be taken to the small claims court.
Another legal point is that under UK law gambling debt is not enforcible, and this could mean that the forcible recovery of a gambling related sum from one party would be illegal.
Neteller could be in trouble for allowing this, since this is against their policy of not allowing chargebacks in disputes. If you told Neteller this was an error, this was a lie, this is a dispute over terms and conditions.

Your terms do not carry an expiry date, so what matters is when this player READ these terms, you cannot expect player to check every single day just because they might have changed, many believe that periodic checks are a reasonable requirement, such as monthly. If changes are made routinely, or even considered, the terms should allow for this by using a rolling monthly offer expiring at the end of the month. The next month could see the offer renewed under existing terms, or the terms changed, but the expiry date informs the player how long the terms they have read are valid for, and if they deposit after this, they should know to recheck the latest set of terms.

You are not like any other MGS casino, no other would dream of taking funds out of players Neteller accounts, they would take the hit for their own silly errors, as they would expect players to take the hit if THEY make a silly error. Do NOT expect players to be absolutely perfect, yet ask forgivness for a silly mistake on your part.
From the evidence posted, it certainly does not look like a case of fraud, or an attempt to abuse a bonus by mathematical trickery (the one bet with entire bankroll scenario). This was one damn lucky hit at Deuces Wild, allowed under the terms, followed by the players belief that the terms had not changed since he last read them, supported by the fact that the banking page let the withdrawal through, followed by your audit team letting it through, and it then remaining a further fortnight in Neteller.
This is known as "responsible gambling", withdrawing after an unexpected big hit, and it is not as if any bonus money escaped, this was removed on the way out.

Microgaming introduced this new bonus system to PREVENT these types of issue from happening. Microgaming have to rely on operators using their part of the software properly, or this system will be just as bad as any other system. The end result is that players will not trust any bonuses offered by casinos, and that is your main marketing tool up the spout.
There are already numerous players who advise not to take bonuses because of the risk of not getting paid, and how are these players to be attracted to a new casino. I have looked at the Prime website and the attraction is, well, nothing unless you want the SUB, no tournaments, no draws, no competitions, no newsletters, not worth playing compared to other casinos that offer such events to regular players.

It now seems that Prime are taking back a number of payments from players Neteller accounts, I hope they are ready for the flak.

As for it not possible to prevent withdrawals if WR are not met, this is not the players problem is it, it is an issue with MG needing to cater for the needs of it's customers. MG never intended EZBonus to work like this, so why have operators not made a formal request as soon as they saw this oversight, why wait till now (this applies to other MGs who tried this rule change, and who had ample time to request it be properly implemented as a feature). If the audit department at Prime were not asleep at the wheel, the payments would have been halted there, and a reputable casino would have refunded them to the players accounts and informed them that terms had recently been changed, but that it had proved impossible to implement the change in the banking screen. The MG banking screen also shows T & C for the bonus system, and where casinos have made this change to the MG standard, these terms are not correct, but are nevertheless still displayed as current to the player who wishes to double check (not many do at this stage though).

I still cannot get over how it is even possible to raid Neteller accounts after the fact like this. It's a chargeback, nothing more. The floodgates have opened, and it will be damn hard to shut them now.

Neteller = not as safe as we once believed.
Chargeback = a valid way of resolving a dispute in our favour if it is the other party that currently holds the disputed funds.

Worse, this Neteller "chargeback" was the FIRST option employed, not the last. Where was "service to the customer". Looks like "b*****d won, and we cocked up by paying, get the money back at any cost to reputation & sod negotiating in a reasonable manner and pointing out how we made an error and ask for understanding"

This is why I am treating this topic in such a hard-nosed manner with respect to the casino, this is how they saw fit to deal with this player's possible mistake (player disputes terms had changed at time of deposit, yet to be proven either way).
 
Many thanks for the comprehensive and supportive argument. I only wish i was half as articulate in writing!

Also, neteller did tell me that Prime told them that account had been credited in error/wrong account credited. They have that in writing.
 

The perversion of the standard MG EZBonus system is the least of my concerns. What I find astonishing is (to quote the original poster):
Two weeks later, Neteller inform me that Prime taken the money back from my neteller account. No word from the casino.
Unheard of, and totally off the wall. I see fault with both NETeller and the casino. Was it indeed 2 weeks later that the funds were retrieved from the player's account?? Did the casino try to contact the player by telephone and email before doing this? As pointed by Vinyl... what if the player had already spent that money?


If the player did indeed deposit after the change in T&C, why did he receive the cashout at all. Ok... let's say the casino goofed. So... it took 2 weeks to find it out -- after the player was paid? Payouts are not audited -- especially new players? And then, you reclaim the funds from his NETeller. Unacceptable.

I do appreciate that PrimeCasino has registered here and taken the time to address concerns, but greater care must be taken by the casino to see that payouts are done in the proper manner, in the proper amount, and (for the love of pete!) stay out of players' NETeller accounts! :eek2:
 
The perversion of the standard MG EZBonus system is the least of my concerns. What I find astonishing is (to quote the original poster): Unheard of, and totally off the wall. I see fault with both NETeller and the casino. Was it indeed 2 weeks later that the funds were retrieved from the player's account?? Did the casino try to contact the player by telephone and email before doing this? As pointed by Vinyl... what if the player had already spent that money?

:

It was 13 days from the deposit that the funds were removed from my neteller account. I can prove with my statement if they is any dispute.
No contact from the casino at any stage. I asked neteller what if i had spent the money and they said Prime would not have got it then! I have asked for some compensation from Neteller but no luck there. Money is not safe in Neteller.
 

What does Playtech has to do with your case?!

I truly believe that most Playtech casinos do not have a 30x bonus wagering requirement but more in the range of 8-20 x B+D.

Also most "fair/honest" casinos would give the player the opportunity to meet his WR and not simply cut his winnings and refund the deposit. In my humble opinion this is a really "unfair" way to solve this issue, especially knowing that your audit/finance team mess up to do their work properly and control that the WR was met before proceeding the player's withdrawal.
 
What does Playtech has to do with your case?!

I truly believe that most Playtech casinos do not have a 30x bonus wagering requirement but more in the range of 8-20 x B+D.

Also most "fair/honest" casinos would give the player the opportunity to meet his WR and not simply cut his winnings and refund the deposit. In my humble opinion this is a really "unfair" way to solve this issue, especially knowing that your audit/finance team mess up to do their work properly and control that the WR was met before proceeding the player's withdrawal.

Well said.
 
What does Playtech has to do with your case?!

I truly believe that most Playtech casinos do not have a 30x bonus wagering requirement but more in the range of 8-20 x B+D.

Also most "fair/honest" casinos would give the player the opportunity to meet his WR and not simply cut his winnings and refund the deposit. In my humble opinion this is a really "unfair" way to solve this issue, especially knowing that your audit/finance team mess up to do their work properly and control that the WR was met before proceeding the player's withdrawal.
With all your respect you arent the best to qualify to disagree in regards to breaking terms and conditions

You are just as useless in regards to responding, and the similar

besides you have caps on wothdrawals, which you dont notify your players about
 
"Ultimately, I would like to make it physically impossible to withdraw from the Casino until the wagering requirements are met but as of this moment, it's not possible in the software."

Josh, if this is the ideal for you then why not return all of bash's money to his account and let him complete the wagering? Clearly the winnings could never be void if this was the case.

You may not be able to change the way the software works but you do have the authority to restore his balance. The software is not forcing you to void the winnings. It is nonsense to make the above statement if you are not prepared to return the money in order for the wagering requirements to be satisfied.
 
For those of you who deposited afterwards and withdrew prior to meeting your requirements, we have refunded your initial deposit less your bonus and winnings.
I believe that the two players mentioned in this thread who had their Neteller winnings removed both deposited on May 7th. One of these players wrote that he has a screenshot showing that the old terms were in place on May 7th. Was this the day the terms changed? Or did the terms change afterwards... so the players deposited and played when the old terms were in place, then the withdrawal was processed after the terms had changed?
 

'More than fair'? are you kidding?

Do these people even think about what they are posting?

I guess if they just took your money back from Neteller then kept your winnings, bonus AND deposit.... that would just be fair instead of more than fair.
 
........Playtech seems to generally follow this rule as well. In addition, their requirements are twice as hard to meet.


Lolz.....Oh dear me. You get caught with your fingers in the till and then dare to point the same bloodied digit in accusation toward PlayTech.

Head shaking embarrassment - truly you need a good dose of reality to put it mildly. More could be said but for now I think the affected player needs to be compensated above and beyond merely returning the deposit and winnings for this very serious transgression. My reading of this first hand (prima facie)lends itself to criminal connotations.


...
 
Thanks for all your support. Here is a screenshot of the famous 1k win. No doubling up on Baccarat- just simply 5 on 4 play DW and prepared to lose my deposit- i.e Playing for luck. Ironic isn't it?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
All the problems appear, including mine with Wofacai, to be coming from Cypriot owned/registered entities these days. Not sure what it is about that place, but I've had enough of it now, deffo a country to avoid.

I like the original terms at Prime best, contained gems like this...

Prime Casino is registered in Cyprus and is incorporated under whatever Elad said to put there.
 
All the problems appear, including mine with Wofacai, to be coming from Cypriot owned/registered entities these days. Not sure what it is about that place, but I've had enough of it now, deffo a country to avoid.

I like the original terms at Prime best, contained gems like this...

Prime Casino is registered in Cyprus and is incorporated under whatever Elad said to put there.
Cyprus is just merely a place where a lot of banking takes place. Many casinos use this to include Cryptos and Playtechs.
 
This is disturbing news that this happens at a MG casino. I am very disgusted by this, if it is true and the facts are correct of course. Incidents of this magnitude are rare (Fortune Lounge). Grand Prive was not this serious.

I am still surprised the casino actually can deposit money from your neteller account to the casino(and then confiscate them). How is this possible without
knowing the 6 digit code? Every time you deposit at MG you have to type this number, and I am pretty sure the software
does not save/store this number anywhere, it would be a security breach. So is it because the casino can 'undo' the last
transaction without knowing the code? Then it must be because Neteller allows to undo a transactions.

And changing how the EZ bonus work is also very misleading. Even when you go to the withdrawal page AT PRISM casino it states
that you can withdraw your money at any time and bonus will be forfeited and you have to accept you will forfeit the bonus. This is because
this withdrawal page is the same for all MG casinos. So what do you trust, T&C changed overnight which you did not know, or believing
what it says on the withdrawal page? And the MG brand will suffer when the casino changes the standard EZ bonus to what ever they want
which the software actually does not support!!! Unbelivable. Seems Prism casino chose the wrong platform for the casino. The Playtech or
RTG platform are much better for this kind of casino management...

Also bash_2357 did not even 'abuse' the bonus in any way - ie. betting full balance on BJ etc. Playing 5$ power VP is not 'advantage player' style.

Zoozie
 
With all your respect you arent the best to qualify to disagree in regards to breaking terms and conditions

You are just as useless in regards to responding, and the similar

besides you have caps on wothdrawals, which you dont notify your players about

Hi Uungy

Please explain me either in the thread or in a PM where you feel our Casino is misleading players. I was always very confident that our T&C is clear and that all our commercial emails contain all needed information needed by the player to fully understand the given bonus or free cash.

I would be more than happy if you could point me to where you found something to be unclear or could be wrongly interpreted. I would then have it corrected or improved.

Thanks in advance, frank
 
Cyprus is just merely a place where a lot of banking takes place. Many casinos use this to include Cryptos and Playtechs.

Well, this is truly sloppy, a legal contract that has a line "whatever Elad said to put here".

This just look so BAD for the casino, it implies that the intention was to construct a term along the lines of "legally licenced and insured", but they cocked up & forgot to replace the marker with the actual name of the entity they wanted to appear to be incorporated under.

Whatever the other points of this case are, the really big issue I feel is the arbitrary removal of already paid funds from the players personal Neteller account. This could turn out to have been an illegal act, but it will require a ruling from the FSA and or Isle of Man. Under UK law, before recovery of a debt can take place, a proper process must be gone through, it is not good enough to just send the "heavies" round and just take it!
Once the casino thought this sum was owed back to it, it should have proceeded in a proper manner in order to resolve the problem. Time and time again, where players are in a similar position, they can resort to the chargeback to resolve the issue, but by and large they dont, they contact the casino, and if that fails they go through a dispute resolution process if one is available, and generally have to accept the ruling.
It seems in this case, these two players have been treated not as customers, but as bitter enemies who had covertly raided the bunkers for 1000 credits or so, so a commando raid behind enemy lines straight to Neteller was sanctioned, while the player, thinking Neteller well enough defended, did not think that they even needed to get the money out ASAP so that the enemy raid could not grab it back.
As Neteller said, had the money not been there two weeks later, Prime would not have got it!
The moral is that to protect against this kind of behaviour, players just need to ensure that they dont leave withdrawals lying around in their Neteller accounts.
Fortune Lounge were rogued merely for refusing to pay bonus players, but they never stooped so low as to retrospectively raid Neteller accounts of those bonus players whom they had paid before and felt they shouldn't have.

Whether the player is right or wrong is now a minor issue, it is the Neteller raids that are the huge worry, many players did not think this kind of act was even possible, and now trust has been ruined, and it can never fully recover until Neteller make a cast iron promise that they will never allow this kind of thing in future.

The only safe way to play at Prime (and any other casino that gains a reputation for charging back Neteller credits) is to deposit with UKash or Western Union, and withdraw by Western Union or similar. This would ensure that once you got paid, you stayed paid, and the advantage for Prime would be that players cannot do a "chargeback" from UKash or WU.
 
A fair compromise.


Hi Mohammed,

There is nothing I can do about Neteller "pulling back" payouts. This is something that every Casino is able to do and I don't imagine that it's going to change any time soon. I understand that this is a major issue for some of you but try to understand that the terms, regardless of what they were before, were this way when you intitially deposited. I have confirmation from support regarding this so your accusations of us not paying you out because you were on the old terms are simply not true. At the time you deposited, the new terms and conditions were in place and I've paid out a significant number of people who were on the old T&C's to be aware of who is and isn't on the list.

Having said that though, here is what I'm going to do. I believe that all of you have a valid point here and after sleeping on it, I agree that you should still be given the opportunity to play through your wagering requirements and not have your winnings simply "stripped away". I'm going to put your money back into your Casino account and when you finish the wagering requirements, you'll be free to withdraw.

I've contacted support and instructed them to take care of you and you should see your winnings back in your Casino account within the hour. I apologize for this inconvenience but I stand by what I said before regarding the T&C's. It is every players' responsibility to read and understand the terms before they deposit. I can't be held responsible for what you believe to be true based on other Casino experiences.

I hope that all of you find this to be fair and reasonable and if there are any other concerns along this vein, please PM me or email me first before getting upset in a thread in this forum. I'm always happy to hear what you have to say and to take suggestions seriously from the good people at CasinoMeister.

Best Regards,

Josh.
 
In the past you have also had misleading emails, and as for having it corrected, that may be the case, however for previous cases prior to having it corrected, you displayed different terms

Its a similar situation to here, as you wouldnt go back on to the original terms, and "Frank" I believe the Manager, was really rude about it, and decided against communicating.

So I think out of the many casinos out there, you are the last to complain in regards to casinos changing direction after displaying one set of terms
 


Josh, I am glad you are finally seeing some sense in the issue. It is a shame it has taken so long and involved so many people. Can you confirm that my account will be credited with 1130 ( i.e including the bonus that was removed?). Otherwise, it simply does not make sense for me to continue wagering as there is no bonus attached to it.
 
In the past you have also had misleading emails, and as for having it corrected, that may be the case, however for previous cases prior to having it corrected, you displayed different terms

Its a similar situation to here, as you wouldnt go back on to the original terms, and "Frank" I believe the Manager, was really rude about it, and decided against communicating.

So I think out of the many casinos out there, you are the last to complain in regards to casinos changing direction after displaying one set of terms

We never changed our T&C since our opening except for adding PokerThree as a restricted game and pointing out in bold that restricted games can't be played before meeting WR. No players were ever catch in those changes we even paid out a check of 1500 to a "smart" player that played PokerThree and win 3 week after our T&C changes.

Please PM me your case for me to review, it's important to me as I do not agree to your statement "So I think out of the many casinos out there, you are the last to complain in regards to casinos changing direction after displaying one set of terms".

We try very hard not to mislead or trap any players as we are looking for long term profit and no quick and dirty benefits.
 
Hi Mohammed,
Having said that though, here is what I'm going to do. I believe that all of you have a valid point here and after sleeping on it, I agree that you should still be given the opportunity to play through your wagering requirements and not have your winnings simply "stripped away". I'm going to put your money back into your Casino account and when you finish the wagering requirements, you'll be free to withdraw.

Congratulation Josh,

This was the right decision to take and it will benefit all the online gambling industry.:notworthy
 
Re: Neteller - I've had experience (and I'm sure others have too), of a casino paying me twice and then taking the extra money back from Neteller when they realised. Although I was shocked they were able to take money from my account without informing me (and lost some trust in Neteller), they had a fairly strong case :)

This issue here is a hundred times worse. It looks like two weeks after the fact a casino can persuade Neteller to allow them to take money from someone's account for a mere technicality, with the casino taking no responsibility for their previous actions (actually I'd love to know what they told Neteller - I'd be very surprised if it was the same explanation we've been given here).

As others have mentioned, this is the casino equivalent of a player making a charge back. It shouldn't be possible, and wouldn't be with most payment methods. In the current situation Neteller can't afford to alienate their customers, and they need to rethink this issue. These chargebacks, if allowed at all, should be restricted to blatant errors (e.g. paying someone twice). In any case the customer should be contacted.

Otherwise Neteller's Achilles' heel - their being so dependent on casinos - could be their undoing in areas other than North America (a lot of players are already wary of keeping more than minimum funds with them).
 
...I like the original terms at Prime best, contained gems like this...

Prime Casino is registered in Cyprus and is incorporated under whatever Elad said to put there.
Funny you should have this. This was posted on their site three weeks before they launched - more or less like a rough draft. I reviewed their website a few weeks ago and didn't see this.

Anyway - good that the smoke is clearing on this. I think the resolution is fair, and I hope this issue is settled.
 
In addition, we're not pioneers in this respect either as Playtech seems to generally follow this rule as well. In addition, their requirements are twice as hard to meet.

Joshu -

I hope you have the balls to apologize for claiming that Playtech follows any rule - because they don't run any casinos and each operator makes its own decisions. The least you can do is get your facts straight.
 
Josh, I am glad you are finally seeing some sense in the issue. It is a shame it has taken so long and involved so many people. Can you confirm that my account will be credited with 1130 ( i.e including the bonus that was removed?). Otherwise, it simply does not make sense for me to continue wagering as there is no bonus attached to it.

Mohammed,

I'm not "finally seeing some sense" at all. You have not been truthful with any of us regarding the initial T&C's as I can clearly see that on the day you deposited, the new T&C's were in place. Telling me they aren't is not going to change the reality that you haven't been truthful. As a good faith gesture to you and everyone else in this thread, I decided to put the money back in your account because I agree that this is something we should do for everyone. Even for those who make claims that aren't true.

Enjoy the rest of your stay at our Casino,

Josh.
 
My facts are straight

Joshu -

I hope you have the balls to apologize for claiming that Playtech follows any rule - because they don't run any casinos and each operator makes its own decisions. The least you can do is get your facts straight.

Hi Spearmaster,

You've unfortunately picked the wrong person to have a Playtech discussion with. I worked at Casino Partners for over a year as an Affiliate Manager and I can tell you two things that others can verify. The first is that Casino Partners is owned by Playtech and until quite recently, so was CPays. Playtech also indirectly had a considerably large share of IOGCasinos which is now owned and operated by PartyGaming. Though Playtech is a public company, the chief shareholder is a man named Teddy Sagit. Teddy is who we all had to answer to at Partners and the same held true with CPays.

I think it's your turn to apologize, my friend.

Josh.
 
Mincing words

Spearmaster,

All Casino operators are bound by their Terms of Service and QOS agreements with their providers. In these agreements Playtech enforces many things on their Casinos as does MGS. Your statement about Playtech wielding no influence on Casino policy is absolutely ridiculous. Unfortunately, I'm not at liberty to break my confidentiality agreement with MGS for the sake of educating you. However, know that Playtech governs its Casinos to a large extent while MGS has much less control over what we can and can't do. This is largely due to the fact that Playtech provides a complete plug and play solution for their Casinos including a functioning back-office where with MGS, only the software is provided and you must build your own. This makes things considerably more unified between Playtech Casinos than they are through MGS.

Josh.
 
Let me quote you again and ask you how in the world Playtech can exert such control over their operators, such that each of them must apply B*30 and have specific requirements that are twice as hard to meet.

PrimeCasino said:
I'm sorry to hear that some of you are upset about the change in our terms and conditions. Regarding withdrawals from Neteller accounts "after the fact", these payments should never have been made in the first place according to the terms and conditions. I'm sorry that you saw an initial payout but we simply do not allow withdrawals at all until the B*30 is met. Again, I'm sorry if this seems unreasonable but these are the terms and had you deposited prior to these terms taking effect, this situation would not apply to you. In addition, we're not pioneers in this respect either as Playtech seems to generally follow this rule as well. In addition, their requirements are twice as hard to meet.

If you make a claim, you better back it up with fact, my friend.

Also, I would be keen to hear what XXLClubCasino thinks of your claim...
 
I'm the other player aka23 mentioned. My case is very similiar. I signed up and deposited $100 on May 7, requested a withdrawal May 8. $80 of the bonus was voided and $667 hit my Neteller account May 11. May 22 these $667 was taken back from me.

While I'm not happy with the resolution, I too am ready to complete wagering as long as the $667 + $80 bonus is credited my casino account.

I'll send you a pm with my username, Josh.
 
Wow this is disturbing...

I have so many questions... where to begin?

What if this player had withdrawn by another method? When the casino decided they paid in error (and I do mean this specific error), what would have happened then?

These funds were in NT for 2 weeks... what if the player had withdrawn from NT in those 2 weeks, or made a deposit somewhere else? Would NT have created a negative balance to the player on behalf of the casino? Would the player's next deposit to NT have been confiscated to cover that negative balance?

Josh - Even though it is quite apparent that Prime performed some sort of transaction through NT that removed those funds, therefore proving you can do it, it's not right... on any level. If your security and screening process green lights a payment, and that payment is transmitted, it's over. You had your chance to dispute it long before. You come back 2 weeks later with a dispute? Bah! What do you run over there, a common street gang? It's just not going to be acceptable that you went into a player's personal account and.. damnit, let's call it what it was.. stole money from him!

If you sent him a paper check and he put it through his bank, what do you think the bank would say if you called them and asked them to send you the money back? That's right, they'd tell you to f'off. On what level is this right just because it was NT?

There are a variety of factions on this forum, with opinions sometimes so polarized that we can chew each other's heads off for days on end. But I guarantee you that every member here would unite in denouncing this action, and as it appears, even a peer casino is crying foul!

Glad you have agreed to negotiate something with the player.

but...

it's a small amount (in casino terms), and I think you should just give it back and be done with it. I don't care what terms he didn't complete, your security team dropped the ball...! You have an issue with them! Take it out of their paychecks or write it off as a loss if you have to. You cleared this player and funded him. It's over unless he wants to voluntarily play it through. You should immediately re-fund his NT account and ask him to deposit it back legitimately and play it through. You have no right to force him at this point, in my opinion.

Secondly, your casino is going to really suffer unless you state openly that this will never happen again to any player. It is going to spread like wildfire that your operation has a gun pointed at the forehead of every player who maintains a NT account, and uses it at your casino. What are you going to do now? Damage control would be a priority here, and it should happen very quickly least this fire starts spreading to all the other gambling forums.

You need to state that your security team is sufficiently trained, capable, and that all approved cashouts are FINAL. You do what you want, it's your business, but in light of this serious issue, players are going to need that extra level of trust. Good luck... do the right thing with this player.

As for the other casino reps who read this thread, thanks to Prime, we all know you all could possibly do the same thing as well. That's going to be a problem. The operations that come out with wording in their T&C's that state all cleared payments are final will be the educated consumer's first choice, so think about it. The rabbit's outta the hat here...

And now we're left with NetTeller. It would nice to know their position on this... and it would be especially good to know if Prime in any way misled them into reversing those funds. We need information there before that can get patched on their end. Hopefully NT will be interested in filling that hole and then we won't need the casino's voluntary cooperation.

Gawd this is bad.... disgusting... :mad:

- Keith
 
There is nothing I can do about Neteller "pulling back" payouts. This is something that every Casino is able to do and I don't imagine that it's going to change any time soon.
Just because you are able to do it, it does not make it right. Imagine that I invite you to dinner at my house, and I leave my wallet lying on the table. Even if I owe you money, you have no right to helping yourself to the cash in my wallet without my permission.

I hope you are similarly sympathetic to players making chargebacks on credit cards.
 
Spear,

I know exactly who you are and who you work for so I find it even more entertaining that you're willing to dispute this fact with me. In addition, your first statement, "I hope you have the balls" hardly adds to your credibility and should make you even more embarassed given who you work for. Do they know that you're posting here? I'm curious because I wonder how they would feel about one of their employees acting like a 6 year old.

Are you honestly going to lie to everyone in this thread? Are you going to sit here and tell them that Playtech doesn't own Casino Partners and formerly several other Playtech Online Casinos? I'm still not understanding what you think is out of line here or if this just you taking Pot Shots at competing software. Let's take what I said once more:

"as Playtech seems to generally follow this rule as well. In addition, their requirements are twice as hard to meet."

I'm quoting myself again since you obviously have reading comprehension issues. I said that Playtech seems to generally follow this rule. For example, take Casino Tropez. This casino is owned by Casino Partners and has the following terms:

" In the interest of fair gaming in order to cash out any amount of money you must wager at least eight (8) times your play bonus plus deposit. If you withdraw before having reached the minimum wagering requirements, your bonus and winnings will be void. "

Perhaps you explain to me how what I said was incorrect. I said they "generally follow this rule". The rule being that you can't withdraw until the bonus is cleared or both your winnings and bonus will be void. I never once stated that all Playtech Casinos are the same. You simply decided that this is what I said and then twisted my words to suit your argument. Perhaps you should re-read what I initially said in order for you to better process it.

Also, I'm still waiting for you admit that Playtech DOES in fact own some of its operators: Specifically Casino Partners for example. Owning your operator, regardless of how much you think you can argue it, means that they exert some level of control over it.

Cheers,

Josh.

Let me quote you again and ask you how in the world Playtech can exert such control over their operators, such that each of them must apply B*30 and have specific requirements that are twice as hard to meet.



If you make a claim, you better back it up with fact, my friend.

Also, I would be keen to hear what XXLClubCasino thinks of your claim...
 
Also, I would be keen to hear what XXLClubCasino thinks of your claim...

Spearmaster

I would simply not know for sure about this. As playtech is a publicly traded company everyone could buy playtech shares. Meaning any person owning casino partners could be holding shares in Playtech. If this make Playtech owning Cpays or Casino Partners (Euro Partners) I don't know.

For sure all Playtech licenses are not owed by Playtech and I find it hard to believe but everything is possible. I for sure never heard about it and if it is true it's a well kept "secret".

Anyway it would not change anything with regards to this thread.
 
Josh, since I see you have replied to this thread after I posted here and sent you a pm, may I ask why my pm has not yet been answered?
 
Hi Josh...

Still not been credited yet? You said an hour or so about 3 hours ago? Also presumably the bonus of 100 will get returned? So i can meet the wagering requirements.

I am willing to accpet this resolution even though many above feel that i should get the money back straight into my neteller account.

Thanks
 


Write your reply...

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top