New Grey Zone Casino Review Winna Casino

[Webzcas]

We have a new casino reviewed and listed here on Casinomeister, in the form of Winna Casino which was launched last year in 2025 and is licensed by the Tobique Gaming Commission.

Styling itself as a 'Crypto First' online casino, Winna Casino boasts of featuring thousands of games to choose from within their game lobby.

Max has this to say about Winna Casino:

Let’s begin by putting the cards on the table: Winna has been involved in some pretty unpleasant cases at Casinomeister with the end result being that we have a standing Warning against them. However, there hasn’t been much more of this in the past eight months or so AND they have changed their licensing jurisdiction so maybe they’ve decided to start with a clean page and better themselves.

 

[SYPlayer95]

I thought players were advised to avoid winna.

Which one is it?

Id expect a 1* rating on a casino to be avoided, not 6.2?

Not to be doom and gloom, but this is literally being made up as we go along now.

Next rating- Del Oro 7.3?

 

[Webzcas]

For me there are a couple of stand out alarm bells.

First one being: Tobique Gaming Commission

Second the fact that the PAB team have had issues with them in their short time online.

I don't though write the reviews or review the casinos. But I do try and point out the pertinent points for the membership when announcing a new casino review on the forum.

However, Max's comments which I always highlight, are always relevant.

 

[andysbetting1187]

For me there are a couple of stand out alarm bells.

First one being: Tobique Gaming Commission

Second the fact that the PAB team have had issues with them in their short time online.

I don't though write the reviews or review the casinos. But I do try and point out the pertinent points for the membership when announcing a new casino review on the forum.

However, Max's comments which I always highlight, are always relevant.

I do feel for you with the situation that is ongoing and I know its not your fault, so please don't think im having a go at you @Webzcas but I think that either the reviews need to be clearer or come with a much bigger warning around them.

A 6.2 rating is pretty middle of the road - so for someone scan reading its not a shit place as that would be 0 or 1, and it's not a 9 or 10 as that would be on the same level as my Mrs 10 years ago (we can't stop ageing unfortunatley)

It seams there have been a few reviews latley where you will post a review, but then have to defend that you don't write the reviews which leans towards "we are being told what to post" but casinomeisters reputation is more than solid across multiple forums and it would be a shame if someone got scammed etc. Even the pros and cons of some of the reviews recently miss off important terms (e.g. changing bets can be seen as advantage play, previous bets must be a % of balance or its suspicous, fees for withdrawing) - these are really important to players and it comes across that these are being glossed over

I don't know mate - just my opinnion but the forum has always been an open place for riasing concerns etc.

 

[Webzcas]

Oh I hear you and believe me I am not defending them, on many occasions I in the main agree with the points raised.

As for the forum being an open place for raising concerns. Absolutely and long may this continue

 

[paul7388]

I do feel for you with the situation that is ongoing and I know its not your fault, so please don't think im having a go at you @Webzcas but I think that either the reviews need to be clearer or come with a much bigger warning around them.

A 6.2 rating is pretty middle of the road - so for someone scan reading its not a shit place as that would be 0 or 1, and it's not a 9 or 10 as that would be on the same level as my Mrs 10 years ago (we can't stop ageing unfortunatley)

It seams there have been a few reviews latley where you will post a review, but then have to defend that you don't write the reviews which leans towards "we are being told what to post" but casinomeisters reputation is more than solid across multiple forums and it would be a shame if someone got scammed etc. Even the pros and cons of some of the reviews recently miss off important terms (e.g. changing bets can be seen as advantage play, previous bets must be a % of balance or its suspicous, fees for withdrawing) - these are really important to players and it comes across that these are being glossed over

I don't know mate - just my opinnion but the forum has always been an open place for riasing concerns etc.

Couldn't agree with you more.

Thats why i sort of mentioned the casinos and ratings getting added these days on the post I made yesterday.

6.2 for a casino like that is a joke.

Lol half of Jan's group are all only rated 8.3. Yet others in his group are high 9's. How there can be so much of a difference in rating from casinos that are basically the same. Owned by same group. Same Rep and terms . Yet such a difference in rating. Makes no sense.

 

[Webzcas]

We ( The Mod Team ) hear you all loud and clear. The scoring system as mentioned in several threads does require an overhaul and this is in line to happen.

However, what is good is that there are checks and balances in place already. Not only the forum where newly reviewed casinos can be discussed, such as this thread. But also in the Max's Desk comments which appear above the fold on the casino review page.

Plus I do tend to point out the negatives as well as the positives when announcing a new review here on the forum,

 

[SYPlayer95]

We ( The Mod Team ) hear you all loud and clear. The scoring system as mentioned in several threads does require an overhaul and this is in line to happen.

However, what is good is that there are checks and balances in place already. Not only the forum where newly reviewed casinos can be discussed, such as this thread. But also in the Max's Desk comments which appear above the fold on the casino review page.

Plus I do tend to point out the negatives as well as the positives when announcing a new review here on the forum,

Exactly that. The feedback and the review is fine, but in my view, the score just doesn't match the review.

E.g my earlier post. 6.2 but a warning for everyone to avoid. It is so contradicting.